...plus a few edits on the Rushey Platt ind est which I forgot to save before

Hi Puxim.

As you've been told twice before, on-ground evidence points to the A338 now following Ormond Road. The source you're using (Oxfordshire highways) is probably outdated.

From aerial imagery, the road goes under the bridge. I've changed it to service because looking at Wiltshire council PROW GIS data the road isn't a public highway (unclassified), just looks like a service road which leads to the sewage works and carries the footpath along it.

thanks, probably got messed up while I was copy+pasting a load of building tags

Hi, FYI I've reverted your changset since the latest Bing imagery (around Aug 2022) doesn't show the junction changes which were made here in mid-late 2023.

I can't find any evidence that the A3026 has been re-routed so I've reverted Windmill Drive back to tertiary and Tidworth Road back to primary.

Then again, I haven't done a ground survey so I'll open a note requesting one.

*of a, turns out I can't spell

Messed up changeset comment (autofill); this was mostly buildings, fences and some landuse.

I've restored the A403 to trunk status; the reason why this user may have thought it's a non-primary A road is because some of the signs are white text on a dark green background.

These are mostly likely however either old signage where the colour has faded or a printing error (see here https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.524420832332&lng=-2.6850449480141&z=17&pKey=800512104216208&focus=photo&menu=false)

The newer-looking signage seems to indicate it is a trunk road. (See example https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.50371052&lng=-2.698312131999&z=17.436678368357022&pKey=2903562716591265&focus=photo&me)

Hi, I know this was quite a few months ago but apologies for the poor editing quality, I can't exactly remember what I was doing that day but I think I was just improving some alignments.

Seems I forgot to fix the relations and leave a half decent changeset comment.

Evening Phil, apologies for the delayed response.

There are numerous uncopyrighted sources available all showing the same route.

"Proposals are un-verifiable and do not belong in OSM." .... In that case, surely the proposed tag as a whole shouldn't be recognised? Lots of other proposed schemes (even ones nowhere near as close to fruition as this) are mapped out in OSM data; eg. Lower Thames Crossing.

It would've been useful for the NWRR route to be available in OSM data (should it be approved), but I suppose it isn't worth debating given it isn't even viewable on any standard map. However this is the first I've heard that proposals shouldn't be mapped at all.

Hi DaveF

Apologies about this; I read incorrect information on a forum, my mistake.

It routes correctly now, routing etc usually takes a little while to update

Hi Puxim, I've reverted your edits changing the road catagories and numbers through Wantage town centre.

Road signage says that the A338 no goes through the shopping area itself, by the looks of it this was changed about 10 years ago.

Google Maps still classes the roads as you've put them but this is outdated; please refer to ground truth rather than other maps.