Hey Ryan,

Just as an FYI I have changed area:highway=pedestrian back to area=yes and highway=pedestrian as per the wiki (area:highway=*?uselang=en-GB#Differentiation_area:highway_vs._area=yes_on_a_highway) this is the preferred method for tagging routable pedestrian areas. Cheers.

*Colthrop, rather

*Commercial, even

*parking, rather

Open to pedestrians that is, not traffic yet

Hi PatchUK, are you sure this section is two-way? Upon surveying on 16 Aug, I found no entry signs at the bottom (see photo https://photos.app.goo.gl/dChxeqWjV1CnfvFr7) Combined with what's been said in the newsletters etc, this seems one-way, unless the signs/road markings have changed since I took it?

...and removed some generic terraces too, so they can be mapped individually

*believe, rather

Hi, sorry for the late response. I wouldn't mind removing it for the time being as it's no longer actively proposed, on the off-chance the scheme does get rejuvenated it could just be added back I guess.

Based off a quick Google search, it does seem there's a renewed push to get just the Winterbourne Stoke bypass and Longbarrow junction built so maybe hold off on that for now?

Hi, sorry for the late response but it looks like a general workplace equipment supplier. There's probably better tagging for it as I wasn't quite sure, I tagged it as that on a whim while adding a few businesses in this area.

beat me to it!

And changed B4069 to construction, since repair works have started now

Hi, just wondering what your source is for this edit since most indicators say that the Scott Way name will continue all the way down to the roundabout? Superceding what was Elcombe Rd.

This doesn't seem right given that the new houses along the road are addressed as Scott Way, and having a look at plans, the roundabout by the old farm is referred to as connecting Scott Way and Wichel Way.

The latter (I'm awful at checking relation gaps), thanks for flagging