Can you please give a source why this small section of road supposed to be unpaved in the middle of all paved roads? way/700017741

had you been there on survey? Road surface looks more like concrete. Please confirm unpaved surface added in this area

I understand the classification. But what was your source of these roughly 100 places you added or modified? Did you copy them from some database? In OSM we care very much that the license permits us to do so. This is one fundamental pillar.

what is your source to tag Cheong Doi as Town? Or others?

I understand that you like the way your parking lots are rendered. But comparing them with different imagery sources hints, that they are not nearly as accurate as they appear now. Better avoid "mapping for the renderer", just to have something look nice on the "default" map.

Sorry, just noticed the source tag was not touched by you. I leave it to the local community to decide what to do with them: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=72291

way/911428986
way/911428970
so not exist, like others. Do you think this is funny?

I fixed it. One way had a wrong direction and the ways had been on wrong position in both relations, so they did not form a closed loop.

only upload real, existing data

do not add invented roads

we want only existing features in OSM. Not "invented" bridges and roads

Please STOP to draw not existing roads through nowhere, like way/918536056

why are you drawing a "highway construction" dozens of kilometers? What is your source? Are you making it up?

what is "reupload2"? What kind of changes are you doing? your comment does not give any hint.

you really messed up this area. Non-existing roads hundreds of meters cross-country. I will revert this and check what else is to clean up. Please be extra careful what you edit in the future

what is the purpose of adding a quite long source tag to so many elements? Wouldn't it be better on the changeset?

how certain are you regarding the tagging style? I have no longer the relation/2067731 in planet_osm_polygon. Probably, because it is no longer a valid multipolygon?

I will not judge on your re-classification of highways into trunk. But if you do so, please do it in a proper way. I corrected lots of links with not matching classification.

thanks for adding building outlines. As you can easily see in the rendering, these outlines suffer from a low-quality geometry. Could you please re-visit the area are use the orthogonalize tool of your editor to get right angles of the building corners right?. Thank you.

another stub tagged as secondary. way/817893637 why are you doing this? I feel I should have reverted this change instead of trying to repair it.