Please pay attention to not add duplicate ways on top of existing ones. I had to delete way/589745353

Pure coincidence. A neuronal network came to the same conclusion that you came to. For me in person it would have not been clear enough to add unpaved.
Check out the forum and give feedback on that different approach: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=62138

way/583106592:
What was your source of the unpaved tag here?

Regarding way/533509802:
Did you check on the ground? How did you come to the "unpaved" conclusion?

Can you please double-check way/588093805

It ends in the no-where. It has the same tagging as the major highway it connects to. Probably unclassified and continuation along the hamlet at the canal sounds better.

Polygon of Rama IX park was invalid (self-intersect). Please also do no glue to ways. In addition it overlaps the ways to stretch to the other side which is certainly wrong.

I would remove oneway=no on roads where it is obvious. Otherwise we can tag hundreds of default values. Also check your settings on how the oneway=no ended up on that road. It looks like you created it from scratch. All nodes and the way had been in version 1 created by you.

I fixed the missing religion=buddhist on the temples you added here. In the future, please add this.

Hello Tom,
how certain are you regarding the ref 3233 on that small side road? way/586453172 is just 600m long. It does not look like a secondary road. More like a residential or even a service road for the industrial estate there. Please also do not set oneway=no on roads which are obviously not oneway.

please don't duplicate data which is already there. OSM is a volunteer project. You create extra work...
Please also follow the established tagging convention

What is your point? You do bad tagging in a large portion of your tagging. Does the exact number matter? Run the query yourself: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/yzi

366 nodes, 62 ways

It is unusual to add source tags to the individual elements, especially for such common things like GPS or survey. In case you plan to continue doing it: Please use the correct spelling of the tag, which is "source". Note the small "s". You did hundreds with a capital S.

what is north of the bridge of the bypass? Currently a major road suddenly ends. You would be stuck in front of the bridge. Can you add connection to the road network? Can you add the roads still under construction in the north? Walking there with GPS to get the track?

the way/581633062 does not look like a major highway. Why is it tagged tertiary? Looks more like a track...

as no Mapillary available, here is the area on streetview: https://www.google.com/maps/@18.401278,98.8761412,3a,75y,78.25h,72.73t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s3TZAF8meZKAmqVow3hABcQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

I see the ref number listed on the rural road website, but is this really reflecting the reality?

way/535043410
This is a 500m stretch of road which looks at most like a residential. How certain are you regarding the tertiary status and the reference number just added?

you changed the name from Thai into English for some features. Please don't do this. The country is Thailand, so the official language is Thai. English can be in "name:en" tags.

Way: Karon Beach (134394729)
Also Phuket should be in Thai, not English

you deleted a lot of features there without much comment. Why had the features been deleted?

Way: 477111624

landuse=1 doesn't make sense. Is it lanes=1? Or a service=alley?

Why did you delete 549451125? It is clearly visible on recent aerial images, even not yet in OSM. Did you contact the original mapper?