Thanks for trying to contribute. Unfortunately your edits need much improvement. Please seek out for some guiding on how to correctly add things to OSM. For example you created some artificial boundaries to the woos which clearly not exist in this way. Also your road classification needs improvement.

Why are you tagging ways which are at best agricultural track as highway=tertiary?
I see you are participating in organized mapping. Please contact your organizer for some training

This is a Buddhist graveyard? As you changed it from cemetery you indicate it belongs to the temple next to it. I know this concept mostly from Europe where a graveyard is next to the church.

The aerial looks much more like the Chinese cemeteries I have seen before...

Right. But locals seem to consider it so important that they print it on the limited space available on the signs.

Typically in OSM we avoid abbreviations in the data. So we add Street instead of St.

If a data consumer wants to generally avoid it then it can be filtered at nearly no cost. See the osm2pgsql Lua script for example. Adding something missing is nearly impossible.

So at least where local people explicitly write something I think we should then add it as well.

You did not create the tagging, but should have noticed that for most of the ways the highway=tertiary is absolutely not reasonable. eg way/274228028
and way/274228023. In tsuch cases please change to something more appropriate.

For example at node/997415485 you did not add the "Ban" to the village name, despite it being written like this on their village sign. Any specific reason for not doing so? I think it should be ບ້ານຫ້ວຍຊຽງ

why is for example way/516234777 not connected to the rest of the network?

way/529811317
way/529811311
way/529811338

and others in that area are clearly residential roads in a newly constructed residential area. Should be tagged as such, not service.

also deleted way/529718916

You have (at least) those two roads newly created on top of existing highways. I am deleting them now. Please double check for existing roads before uploading.

way/529718919
way/529718917

sorry, comment belonged to one changeset earlier. Changeset: 45285727
Thanks for fixing bad tagging. That maps.me user had a near 100% fail rate with the tagging...

openstreetmap is a public geo database. We collect facts. Please stop adding your noted into name-tags...

openstreetmap is a public geo database. We collect facts. Please stop adding your noted into name-tags...

Can you please check the spelling of the monument? It does not render correctly. The unicode string looks broken. Seems you have broken characters at the beginning and in the end.

Do not abuse the name tag for comments. "Entrance fee to pass" is not the name of this feature. I removed it and replaced it by fee=yes which is the correct way to indicate this.

Sorry that you did not get it the first time. What you are doing is wrong!

The name tag is only for the official name of a feature. It is not meant for you to express your frustration about paying an entrance fee to whatever attraction it is.

In addition to that you uploaded duplicate data over existing one. The following node (exactly same location) contains all the relevant information of your edit minus your nonsense name tag:
node/1700555516

Until it was recently moved by a different user by 7 meters it was also at exactly the same location at where your duplicate node has been which I had to fix for you.

"Entrance fee 100 Baht" is certainly not the name of it. So you abuse the tagging. Please don't do that. I understand your frustration about having to pay a fee. Still: abusing name tags to have this highlighted on the map is not appropriate.

You did duplicate geometry so I fixed it. In addition the node you refer to had inappropriate tagging on it there is an entrance fee for the national park, not for the lift gate. Park already has fee=yes.

Crazy Horse seems to be a common name for the rocks. On that "alternative" map there are multiple reviews mentioning this (search for "Crazy Horse Buttress"). Maybe keep it as "alt_name:en"?

I did only fix the tagging of the data. With the wrong format the data can not be evaluated.
Shop is still there. Also I did not change the name. Thanks for cross-checking.