only upload real, existing data

do not add invented roads

we want only existing features in OSM. Not "invented" bridges and roads

Please STOP to draw not existing roads through nowhere, like way/918536056

why are you drawing a "highway construction" dozens of kilometers? What is your source? Are you making it up?

what is "reupload2"? What kind of changes are you doing? your comment does not give any hint.

you really messed up this area. Non-existing roads hundreds of meters cross-country. I will revert this and check what else is to clean up. Please be extra careful what you edit in the future

what is the purpose of adding a quite long source tag to so many elements? Wouldn't it be better on the changeset?

how certain are you regarding the tagging style? I have no longer the relation/2067731 in planet_osm_polygon. Probably, because it is no longer a valid multipolygon?

I will not judge on your re-classification of highways into trunk. But if you do so, please do it in a proper way. I corrected lots of links with not matching classification.

thanks for adding building outlines. As you can easily see in the rendering, these outlines suffer from a low-quality geometry. Could you please re-visit the area are use the orthogonalize tool of your editor to get right angles of the building corners right?. Thank you.

another stub tagged as secondary. way/817893637 why are you doing this? I feel I should have reverted this change instead of trying to repair it.

another traffic signal in the middle of a road in the woods node/5916344428? the road is connected with a 50m stub you marked as secondary. Is your comment about mapping quality serious?

I removed the imaginary traffic signals

why tagging a short section of agriculture track as unclassified? way/817897608 I changed it back.

I fixed node/5914707437 and node/5914651106 and node/5914650830 and node/7638446078. Please also do not wildely classify roads as secondary. They certainly are not. At most tertiary.

please do only add what is there. For example the traffic lights are quite certainly not there. you specified Bing as imagery source. Neither on Bing nor on other imagery sources are structures visible which could be traffic lights.

way/864217443 is at most agriculture track. Certainly no tertiary. I fixed it for you.

a pharmacy is a pharmacy, not a clinic. I fixed it for you.

amenity=post_box
name:en=Ernst

sounds unrealistic. Please explain.