Hi,

This restriction isn't accurate, based on 2020 mappilary imagery which is far latest than bing street side. (https://bit.ly/2S1osG9). Based on this image, it clear that vehicles in right most lane exiting Haymarket can take right into Pall Mall. There are even lane markings confirming the same. Kindly revisit this changeset and update it according to ground. Happy mapping.

Thanks,
Kalyan

Hi,

Thanks for the quick fix. Appreciate the turn around.

Thanks,
Kalyan

Hi Carsten,

You have added this (relation/12565204) restriction on one way. Which is blocking the access on Glück-Auf-Straße. Can you kindly revisit this changeset and make changes (if any).

Thanks,
Kalyan

Hi Hacks,

In this changeset you have restricted vehicular access into both lanes of the segment (way/441592169) except for buses. This has created an impossible oneway (with no inbound and outbound) for connecting segments. Based on available resources only one lane is dedicated for buses. osm.wiki/Bus_lanes#Examples please refer these examples for best tagging practices.

Thanks,
Kalyan

Hi,

Thanks for your contribution in this vicinity, please be extra cautious when you are modifying high priority roads, unintentionally you have created impossible oneway (with no inbound), one of our editor fixed it now. And I noticed you are using old version of Id editor, please update it to 2.19.6 (current version). This version will display warnings in the event of potential errors.

Thanks,
Kalyan
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100680974

Hi,

Is there any reason for deleting link roads along the length of Eubank Boulevard Northeast, https://snipboard.io/LQ2bFp.jpg please refer to this screenshot for missing roads/links. According to our internal resources as of Feb-26, roads exist. Kindly share some background behind this change.

Thanks,
Kalyan

Hi Miles,

Ideally left turn should remain restricted, because there is a slip lane emerging from Prestwold lane. But not sure about legality of the turn restriction, as there is no evidence (street side/sign board). If you are aware of local road policies, please make edits accordingly.

Thanks,
Kalyan

Hi Miles,

You have modified directions of a small dual carriage way and added turn restriction probably based on "do no enter" sign board. Now this change is restricting vehicular access from Nottingham road to Loughborough Road. Could you kindly relook into this edit and modify directions/restrictions(if any).Ideally this intersection should look like this (https://snipboard.io/oIHun0.jpg). Please let me know your thoughts.

Thanks,
Kalyan

Hi Jengelh,

Thanks for the prompt action and response.

Regards,
Kalyan

Hi Jengelh,

According to this page https://www.friedland.de/startseite/aktuelles/sperrung-heidkopftunnel.html construction work was set to conclude by 28/Dec/2020. Kindly relook at construction progress and update the road (if any).

Thanks in advance,
Kalyan

Thanks for the prompt response and action.
Kalyan.

Hi NikNaks,

You have added this (relation/12129620) only right restriction as a part of this changeset. This relation restricts access from Barleythorpe Road to Melton Road and contradicts with lane markings visible in aerial imagery which shows straight on is allowed. Can you kindly recheck this restriction? Happy to learn from you.

Thanks,
Kalyan

Hi,

We can add new relations to existing road segments, please do not create duplicate error segments in OSM. I'm reverting these edits, since it is causing overlapping segments.

Regards,
Kalyan
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83615798

Hi,

Greetings for the day.
This changeset created lot of unintended errors https://snipboard.io/0ZAHm8.jpg like this one. And many driveways are now connected to side path, which completely restricts motor vehicle routing into driveways
way/375425004 like this one. This was earlier a proper dual carriageway, what is the reason behind reverting the edit? Please let us know the inconsistency with this road so that we can fill in gaps, instead of reverting the complete edit.

Thanks,
Kalyan

Hi,

Greetings for the day.
You have remodeled Bielenberg Drive and added this new segment four months ago.
way/745718978 But, according to the latest imagery(03/08/2020) above bridge doesn't exist on ground. Our drivers are continuously reporting errors and re-routing from this place. Kindly verify this again.

Regards,
Kalyan

Hi,

Thanks for quick response and action.

Regards,
Kalyan

Hi,

way/138876877 Is this emergency access road? This is a bit unconventional. Please verify this again.

Regards,
Kalyan.

Hi,

I have added barrier and note accordingly.
Note ID: 2092613. Thanks again for reviewing my edit and for your valuable inputs.

Regards,
Kalyan

Hi,

Thanks for your inputs. I have modified road class to footpath. I'm not sure of barrier type existing at this place, since I have made edit based on internal Driver feedback and OS Open data street view. Is it okay if I add a generic "barrier=yes"? so that it can be later tagged with specific value.

Regards,
Kalyan

Hi Mueschel,
I didn't understand your point on how to add maxspeed:forward and maxspeed:backward for a uni-directional road. Please help me in understanding that information. As per your inputs, I have gone through the mappilary imagery of entire road stretch and identified the right maxspeed tags and updated them in OSM (80528644). Let me know if any further changes are required.
Regards,
Kalyan