Thank you for doing this.

Hi there, is the Dacid Bowie Centre open now? I thought it was going to be another two weeks or so.

If it's not open, why did you remove the construction prefix for the DB Centre node?

@trigpoint - perhaps it should have been reverted, but it got edited back, so all's well I think.

It's there now. I've separated the shop tags from the building tags and created two areas for Aldi and M&S. The area of the M&S matches roughly the press release count of 12000 sq ft (1115 sq m); but the shape/location may be a bit wrong, so if you ever visit either shop, feel free to correct it. I'll probably not be in the area until next week.

Oh... My mistake. Sorry to disturb you.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170612909

Are you sure this is closed? It seemed to be open yesterday evening? (But. Now sharing the building with a new M&S Food)

Thank-you!

Also, you have the website wrong. It should be https://www.dover-hotel.co.uk/

According to that site, you have the house number incomplete (42-44, not just 44)

Are you sure this is in the right place? I expect you meant to put it on the Belgrave Road in the Westminster area. In fact this is probably it, already mapped - node/276759615

Welcome to OSM! Saw your discussion on the forum - thanks for following-up and making the edits! Not sure how long it'll take for this change to make it's way into your bike computer.

Hi EmilioL, thanks for providing all this extra info about this hotel. You set the building=yes tag; the default iD editor makes it easy to do this by mistake. I'm about to remove this tag, because this hotel is not a building in its own right; it's part of a complex building that includes other businesses. If you think it should be a separate building - lets continue the discussion here.

Thanks again for your contributions!

Actually added details from new Panoramix images, not "updated opening times from signage". errors.

Corrected in changeset/168681504.

If you come across a few similar errors, feel free to correct them. If it looks like I've systematically made this error in loads of places, please let me know, and I'll fire up JOSM at the weekend and work through them.

Thank-you for bringing these to my attention. I think what's happened is that these ways are correctly (in my view*) marked as bike-only; BUT I've neglected to check the foot-routability of the surrounding roads a a result. E.g. they're marked as sidewalk=separate, but I've ended up effectively removing the sidewalk by mistake. I'll fix them up shortly. (Either by making the sidewalk part of the roadway, or by making most of the cycleway a shared, segregated sidepath with appropriate end points.

Hello! And welcome to OSM. Thank-you for adding this footpath. I've made a couple of changes - so that the main footpath is not blocked by the gate on the side path round the back of No. 13-23. I also extended the path up to the north - to help routers.

If you want to add more sidewalks in future, it would be good to extend them to connect to pre-existing ways; for routers.

Welcome again!

I visited it yesterday and corrected it this morning.

Hi there. In this changeset, you've modified the path layout around this way - way/273786254

It looks like it might have been a mistake- ehat do you think?

Oh, good spot.

Thank you! Might be handy to have this shortcut mapped!

Tah!