Done! (as 93169849). That's my micromapping for the day!

Thanks,

Ken

Morning - thanks for looking into this. You seem to ave removed a brick shed from here - did you mean to?

It's possible your edit crossed lines with my Changeset: 93164743. That one tried to repair the geometry of said shed. But it was orthogonal when I left it.

In the area I've recently expanded into there is an interesting mix of bang-on data from the NLS and total blank zones (some marked 'ruin') - I assume it's war damage - east London took a hammering. And then on Bing and streetside, you can see the post-war build. So I can only add the house numbers for the original terraces, and on the new builds where the numbers are painted large on the wheelie bins. Tower Hamlets Road (here osm.org/#map=17/51.54950/0.01786) is a good example.

That's great! I've just extended the religious area boundary and set it the building up as a religious community hall - which seems to be the best guidance.

Well done on the 1700 church assets. I grew up in the CoI. I've just done something similar for NI schools, hence my interest in this one.

Morning VictorIE - what do you know about the unnamed school building next to St John's church? It seems to be accessible only via the church grounds - is it a Sunday School or a primary/secondary school in the normal sense? Asking because it doesn't seem to be on the DENI school lists.

(Perhaps you know if there is a better local name for the old buildings?)

Done via Changeset: 92884314. I've added the old reference numbers and made the old school names part of the old school building names. Thanks for your help!

Hi there - is way/852501522 definitely an in-use school? Or is it a former school, now closed? Asking because it doesn't appear in the dept. education's lists (processed for OSM cross-checking here: https://osm.mathmos.net/schools/progress/BT/#8/54.675/-6.793)

Another tip for house-numbers is you use Streetside images in JOSM or iD and look for painted numbers on wheelie bins. These are larger and nearer to the camera than the numbers screwed onto front doors.

I'm not sure how wide the coverage is, but it's the out-of-copyright map archive hosted by the National Library of Scotland. It's got most of the house outlines and numbers for the prewar buildings.

In order to use the layer in JOSM, I added this as a TMS layer: tms:https://geo.nls.uk/mapdata3/os/ldn_tile/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.png

Oops! Thanks!

Some of the Chobham Manor ones have it too. I suspect this is our life now. Pity osm.org doesn't put a bit of green on roof gardens.

Thank you!

Yes - it's the indoor what does it. Now you've set it back to area=yes, it's triggered.

There is a green tag at the second link below - it says "Redundant area tagging Tags, `indoor`, already make this an area. ", it's connected to way/152107576. The first link below shows more other bits of inscrutable metadata.

http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/error/c76368e1-3768-2170-b4dd-35a54e14184e

http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#username=DaveF&zoom=18&lat=51.515731&lon=-0.098684&item=3200&level=1%2C2%2C3&tags=&fixable=

(I think)

It doesn't flag railway=platform. It flags indoor=yes.

Looking back it it now, I think was was the rule that matches everything "indoor".

https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend/blob/master/plugins/TagFix_Area.py#L29

If you look at the indoor structures of Bank LUL station, they also are highlighted for area=yes removal - http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=18&lat=51.513054&lon=-0.088181&item=3200&level=1%2C2%2C3&tags=&fixable=

In case it helps you figure out what went wrong - it looked like some of the building:parts got reduced to lines... as if all their nodes were selected, and then the 'L' key was hit to make them all conform to a straight line. In a few other cases groups of nodes got snapped together.

It's all sorted now - I was able to revert those two changesets, and then ONLY upload the Stratford nodes and objects. So phew!

The changes you where trying to do should all be intact too.

The complex part was figuring out which changesets caused the problem. It turns our object histories don't include node movements!

OK, tried it myself, with changeset/88181456 . I don't think I've borken anything you were working on here. Learned a lot about JOSM in the process!