This changeset has drawn new highway=secondary ways over the top of existing residential and service roads. I have reverted in changeset/102577962.

This changeset has drawn new highway=secondary ways over the top of existing residential and service roads. I have reverted in changeset/102578048.

This changeset has drawn new highway=secondary ways over the top of existing residential and service roads. I have reverted in changeset/102577992.

This changeset has drawn new highway=secondary ways over the top of existing residential and service roads. I have reverted in changeset/102577914.

and to be honest I enjoyed typing the changeset comment :-)

Heh, no problem :-)
Land Registry base map is in beta at the moment, but is fantastic for aligning imagery. JOSM, imagery preferences, +TMS button, tms:https://tiles.osmuk.org/PropertyBoundaries/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.png , max zoom 20.

Pennywell Road didn't have the split flare at the end, just joined Lawfords Gate at an angle. So I haven't deleted an island, just didn't add one.

I'm usually hesitant to add islands, as I don't really feel highway=pedestrian is right for a traffic island. landuse=traffic_island was better, but seems not to have found a footing (wiki lists as abandoned).

Hi, and a slightly belated welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Thanks for the additions you're making; all appreciated. Just a couple of pointers, if I may?

Firstly, the 'Q' button in the editor is a useful thing when you've rectangular buildings - it squares all the angles for you.

Secondly, beware of the offset of the imagery. A trick I use is to start with the clearest imagery (Bing at the moment), trace half-a-dozen buildings, then switch to the OS StreetView imagery. It's useless for tracing from (too generalised), but it should be more accurately aligned. So I then move the new buildings to line up with OS StreetView, switch back to Bing, and use the imagery offset panel in the editor to move the Bing imagery to line up with where the buildings are now.

Hope that's useful.

Keep up the good work & happy mapping!

Cheers,

Paul ("southglos")

To be fair, it was tagged as 'proposed', which seems reasonable?

Deleting individual trees and replacing with tree_rows seems backwards? It loses detail. We'd normally go from a generic tree_row to individual trees, to individual trees with species and other details.

Ha! Me too. I always have to refer back to designation=*

Perhaps designation=restricted_byway?

Hi

Not knowledgeable about railway matters, so sorry if this is a silly question, but is that source out of copyright, or something we have explicit permission to copy from?

Cheers

Hi. Thanks for adding this. Just a quick comment if I may: heights should use a period as the decimal separator, so 4.6 not 4,6

But the bridge is signed in feet and inches, so it should probably be 15'0" anyway.

Also appears that Bowstreet Lane/Farm Lane/Berwick Lane/Vimpennys Lane may have been 30mphed now - I've seen the new signs at the Easter Compton end and have tagged a section there, but haven't confirmed how far it extends (all the way to Hallen, I suspect)

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.5349544538665&lng=-2.610987396913218&z=17&pKey=0Aoo6ptjsxdWfHjRWU8chw&focus=photo&x=0.49052370469215684&y=0.4933401464845683&zoom=0

Hi

The houses on the east side of Goldfinch Way (44 to 54) look like they're numbered as part of Eagle Crescent (and CodePoint Open suggests the same); are they tagged with the wrong street?

There's some really weird numbering going on with Eagle Crescent (I mean, who puts number 1 half-way round the crescent!?), so I hesitate to make corrections based on assumptions here!

Cheers!

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

If I may offer some pointers:

shop=doors means it's a shop selling doors. You might want the entrance tag instead: entrance=*

If it's an entrance you're marking, it ought to be a node joined to the edge of the building, not floating around near the building.

You've a typo in the name - "Enterance". But if this is the entrance for Painswick Inn Housing, and Painswick Inn Housing isn't named anywhere else, I'd be inclined to drop the "entrance" from the name anyway.

If you need help fixing any of this, let me know and I'll be happy to assist.

Happy mapping!

Paul.

...and the clubhouse has lost its restaurant, which still appears to be there according to their website.

Hi

I'm trying to work out what's been changed and why in this changeset - seem to be a load of bunkers deleted that another, local user added not four weeks ago, then a load of additions including bunkers. May I suggest making your changeset comments a little more descriptive than just 'edit' - we know it's an edit; it's more useful to know what you've edited and why.

Cheers