It seems like you could have broken the relation here

Congrats!

Hi, can you please use more descriptive changeset comments?

Your definition was just the definition of driveway, which is no different than just using service=driveway versus service=driveway2. Why not use driveway? I still don’t understand how there is any meaningful difference

If it has no meaning or you don’t know one then it is a nonsense tag. If i add h=oefotprkf to 489 reservoirs across the US and someone automatically removes all of them I wouldn’t consider that to be against the rules.

Can you tell me what driveway2 is supposed to mean then?

Thanks for the feedback!

I'm pretty sure individual trees should not be mapped as forest

you're not outsmarting anyone

If something is tagged as forest and it isn't forest, there are two fixes, both of which are not deleting the forest. One is to modify the forest boundary. If the forest encompasses the entire area, then create a multipolygon relation by selecting both and pressing the c button on iD, which I just did to the aforementioned meadow + ponds.

That doesn't justify deleting it, unless the time spent fixing it would be longer than the time spent remaking it. It's more accurate than no forest cover at all and can be easily fixed

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Oh yeah, that makes sense if it's on a phone.

Hey, can you try to use more descriptive changeset comments?

5,000 changesets and doesn't square buildings with the "Q" key when making them. Please do so

Another question - why are your changeset descriptions worded so weirdly?

No idea if this will reach you but don't make diary entries like that, it's considered spam

changeset reverted

These are all manually reviewed, right?

Don't be so rude please

Hi! You seem to be an organization. Please check this out - https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines