completing sentence, "according to" wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wind_farms

Please, note that it's a basic principle in OSM that we should not add a possible object; only if the object is actually known is there.
Moreover, we should not modify a previous object mapped with more reasons to be accurate, as it was the previous extents of neighbour Herval furniture industry, as it is usually known and told in their website.
This has to be reverted. I'll do it.

Hi, what source indicates that Mahindra is there?

Hi, it seems some landuse=residential were duplicate around here, like
way/463717197
and
way/305124213

Hi, It seems that classification was ok before, according to
osm.wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
where it's said Primary Road is only for "major cities", that seems not the case of Doro as a little city in the end of the road. Agreed?

The question is: was the tag "landuse" wrong? Is there an alternative landuse value? If not, was it disturbing anything? Why deleting tags, while there's lots of information lacking elsewhere? We usually avoid deleting things, if it's not plainly wrong.

Hello. Do you know these locations from which you removed "landuse=industrial"? Is this removal approved as default? // Olá. Você conhece estes locais dos quais removeu "landuse=industrial"? Essa remoção é aprovada como padrão?

Olá Simone, bem-vinda ao OSM.
Há algumas dúvidas com os pontos adicionados:
natural=beach não vai em ponto;
"leisure=park" vai na área, não no ponto.
"Name" só para nome próprio; não se coloca "name=Plantação de Eucalipto". Pode colocar "floresta" para mato.
E ficou adicionada a área do "parque à relação da RS-389 (já corrigi).

Você queria adicionar algum parque novo?
Podemos ajudar se precisar.
Para mais informações veja as páginas de etiquetação:
osm.wiki/Pt:Map_Features

Olá Fernando, condomínio vai como
landuse=residential, não
building=residential. Já corrigi. Verificar os limites.

A fonte é survey. Como tá escrito ali. Tem uma baita placa lá encostada na ponte. Vc diz "não encontrei nenhuma placa no local". Esteve lá? Procurou bem?

Falou!

Stop loading fake GPX traces, like these:
@dhs_hiker/traces
why are you doing this?

Olá. Como o trecho de via sem outra saída pode ser de mão única (oneway=yes)?
way/562353038/history
Quem entrar nela, não pode sair?
Ou quem tá fora não pode entrar?
Tem outra saída?

Revertida deleção de construções incompatível com imagens do existente, a pedido da comunidade.

Next time please communicate good intentions of huge changes previously to local community, if there is one, in common channels: talk, osm-forum. And to previous editor. That's good practice, as told in OSM.

It's said: if it's not wrong, don't fix it. Was it wrong?
Also, I suppose it should've been discussed, as usual in OSM, at local, brazilian, community, before undoing Blade's huge work, since he has shown us his results and found no opposition. Right?

Olá, bem-vindo ao OSM.
Apenas uma confirmação, por favor:
Este convento mapeado é um banco ou tem um banco ali também?
Obrigado.

E ali não aprecem cisternas na imagem.

E aqui tem uma "piscina":
way/597359694
Ali não aparece uma piscina.
Só um telhado.

Thank you much!

Hi, please, it seems the relation of the wetland was broken recently, it's lacking outer segments around Baga, here:
relation/5407489#map=12/13.4943/14.3179
Thus the outer wetland is lost, and the inner parts (island) got rendered at inverse.
Was this in your changeset? If so, could you fix it (completing outer lines to close the outer polygon)? If not, please tell me, I fix it further.
(Unfortunatelly it seems there's no other easier way to represent the whole lake as a single entity with all its thousands of islands inside, if not as parts of multipolygons and relation. So sometimes it's broken.)
Thank you.