Is there a sign saying "shortcut" on the path indicated by way/663866965 (north of City Square Mall)? If not, it should not have name=shortcut.

Apartment/condominium complex driveways should be highway=service; highway=residential should (usually) be reserved for named and publicly maintained roads.

Also includes lane use, placement, adjustment of transition point between streets which were not intended to be combined with this changeset

Pardon the noise; this empty changeset was apparently created by a Vespucci bug. The changes that would have gone into it are instead in changeset/69612195.

Pardon the noise; this empty changeset was apparently created by a Vespucci bug. The changes that would have gone into it are instead in changeset/69612195.

Pardon the noise; this empty changeset was apparently created by a Vespucci bug. The changes that would have gone into it are instead in changeset/69612195.

Pardon the noise; this empty changeset was apparently created by a Vespucci bug. The changes that would have gone into it are instead in changeset/69612195.

Ad copy in the description is considered rubbish (junk) in the OSM database. Please omit it from future submissions.

The point has been moved from off the roadway to a nearby building. If this is incorrect please move to the proper location.

OOPS. Sources for this should read: "Geotagged Images; Mapbox Satellite; survey".

Somehow, after telling JOSM to start a new changeset, it decided to still reuse the comment and sources from one I had open.

I've re-tagged them as apparent storage tanks (including two not in this changeset). I'm not in this area often or I'd go survey to confirm.

Oops, this should have said Mellow Lane, not Hughes Road.

This is another example of why meaningful changeset comments are needed. The bounding box for this changeset stretches halfway around the world and it is difficult to see exactly what is changed.

Oops, wrong comment submitted. Should be: add business

There is no address or hours on this business yet.

Also start_date was in the wrong format. It should be in ISO 8601 or YYYY-MM-DD format.

The description looks too much like ad copy and/or content which does not belong in the OSM database.

The description looks a bit too much like ad copy and/or content which doesn't belong in the OSM database.

The opening_hours tag has a specific syntax intended to be automatically parsed by applications (such as OsmAnd). Deviations from this syntax run the very real risk of making the tag unusable. Please review: opening_hours=*

I know this is an old changeset, but if you're still putting in power lines by gluing them to boundaries or other things, please don't. JOSM's validator will throw warnings and it also makes the boundaries harder to edit.

description=* is *not* for ad copy! In general ad copy is considered junk on OSM. Please keep it to factual location, contact, and business type information.

Please do not put ad copy into the OSM database.