skifans's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 88139375 | Hi,
|
|
| 86563220 | (sorry, mean Wray in comment) |
|
| 83080462 | Scrap that ^ |
|
| 83080462 | (Mean southbound) |
|
| 83055789 | See note #2147145 (note/2147145) |
|
| 56769615 | Bit late but just confirming, yes the platforms are staggered (as currently mapped), and yes the bridge is still present. |
|
| 81168356 | Rest of route added in changeset/81175550 |
|
| 81024640 | Sorry, think I've fixed it. Not sure why that happened. |
|
| 64489670 | Cheers, thanks for pointing that out. |
|
| 64489670 | Don't know what came over-me there, yes your right residential is defiantly inappropriate. I think service looks better though, its only for access to the farm. Service is listed "Generally for access to a building, service station, beach, campsite, industrial estate, business park, etc." whereas unclassified is "Public access road, non-residential." and my view is the former fits better but happy to defer if there is something I have missed.
|
|
| 59568569 | Sorry, thank you for the information. Ill ensure I keep a look out, is there a different way this information should be dealt with? |
|
| 59401119 | Ahh, is it where I have split the road which had caused them. That makes sense. About the other tags, do you feel that this should be duplicated and have to/from tags added? If so is there an easier way rather then clicking through all of the roads again? |
|
| 52358249 | Its seems I have, fixing it now. Thanks |