Hi, it most certainly would! There may have been a reason 8 tagged the way I did but I no longer recall. One note of caution I offer is I tried to maintain the same tagging scheme throughout the county and I mapped a substantial chunk of the area so changing this may break from the scheme used elsewhere.

Whatever direction you take thanks for checking and adding updates!

Hey! Happy to see someone else adding building:parts around town :-). Using feet for height is acceptable in the wiki and less confusing to locals.

The F4 map should be adjusted to utilize non-metric tags; not the other way around. osmbuildings.org for example recognizes feet as well as meters and renders things nicely.

Hi Mundilfari! Can you please add descriptions to your change sets so others can understand what you’re editing? Thanks!