seattlefyi's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 152563886 | Hi, welcome to OSM, and thanks for the making the edit/correction! |
|
| 152701484 | Hi, welcome to OSM! Thanks for the edits! I squared the corners of your buildings a little, but otherwise looks great. Thanks again! |
|
| 152825431 | Hi, welcome to OSM! Thanks for the edit! |
|
| 153011884 | Hi, welcome to OSM! Nice job, hope to see more edits! |
|
| 153088913 | Hi, thanks for the edit! The tagging for the driveway looks good, I did remove the name since that tag is really meant for things' names (like "Space Needle"). Thanks again! |
|
| 152563806 | Hi, thanks for the edits! I made a couple of adjustments, hope you don't mind. Moved the descriptive name info to operator, and area between the baseball field pitches to grass. |
|
| 152236150 | Hi, noticed this edit and thought I should mention- the ‘A’ unit was already noted, using the addr:unit key. Thanks! |
|
| 152127903 | Hi, welcome to OSM! Looks good, you’re off to a great start! |
|
| 152011516 | Hi, welcome to OSM! It looks like you edited a few different kinds of things, and for most had small differences with how I'd expect in OSM. It's a good start though! The standalone laundry and deli nodes looked good! Main things I noticed were: 1. No need to describe something in its name ("Building") unless it actually has a name. 2. The buildings and parking lots could more closely follow the area outline in imagery. 3. The Arirang restaurant was already in OSM. Hope to see more edits! |
|
| 150754282 | There's one KartaView image from 2019 which just barely captured it (and I'd been in it at least once) but I think you're right that it's no longer there and correct to remove it now. |
|
| 150643708 | Thanks for updating the Arby's. Here you could either select the building outline, right-click and select "downgrade" which would remove all the business tags. Or in the left panel, remove all of the business tags (keeping the building and addr tags (if any) for the next tenant). Last, no need to add a description value! Thanks again, it takes a while to get the hang of editing, but you're off to a good start, and it's always great to have a new editor! |
|
| 150642221 | Cool pond, nice job here! |
|
| 150642189 | Hi, welcome to OSM! Thanks for the edits! Some friendly tips: 1. Please upload your changes to one area (like a neighborhood or town) before editing the next one over. 2. Your building address tags look pretty good, just please follow the outline a little more closely, and if you press 'q' as the last thing after drawing the building/tagging as a house, it'll square the corners which looks better. 3. The Starbucks is close, but it looks like the brand got attached to the name. Could you please check how it looks? |
|
| 150632116 | It does look like you accidentally dragged and connected several ways. (I've already fixed those.) Please do add the improved version of the trail you mentioned when you can. Thanks! |
|
| 150285233 | Hi, welcome to OSM! I looked at your 3 changesets so far, and they all look really good! For this insurance company, it looks like the name should likely consistently have slashes between each name, or just spaces. Very minor issue, tough to see in the imagery. Thanks, hope to see more edits! |
|
| 150016975 | Hi, thanks for the business update. Just suggesting that in the future, instead of dragging the old node so far, it's easier/better to leave the nodes where they are (with their address tags for the next business). Just remove the business-related tags from the old location and add the business-related tags to the new location. (No need to do anything further on your end, I made some adjustments.) Thanks again! |
|
| 147668833 | Hi, it looks like you've added a house=address_string tag in this changeset. Was that intentional? It looks accidental. |
|
| 147234218 | Hi, your edit looks perfectly cromulent to me. Even the smallest edit embiggens the map! Thanks for the update! |
|
| 147152616 | Hi, yes, it did sound like a sad closure - had heard they had delayed it a few months. Thanks for the update/edit! IMO, using the disused:amenity tag is fine, though "disused=yes" is not recommended. Also, removing the business-specific tags (name, diet, cuisine, website, phone, etc.) is useful, but please leave the address tags for the next tenant. Thanks again! |
|
| 147152996 | Hi, welcome to OSM! Your building and addresses look good. The 'name' key should only be used for actual names, not descriptive or repeated info. (The 23711 in the address should be enough.) I'll comment on the building=terrace tags in a separate message. |