scarapella's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 161000315 | Tes, tou are righy. Yhay was a ytpo! Thank you for pointing it out. Fixed via changeset/164655681. -scarapella |
|
| 163580995 | Hello, I reverted this change manually in change 163580995 to fix the relation. -scarapella |
|
| 163125578 | Hello solongago, Thank you for your contribution to openstreetmap. Did you intend to create a giant circular natural wood relation as part of this change set? If so, sure why not. I mean you have to stop the woods somewhere. I just wanted to check since it was a bit different. Thanks for properly marking out the wetlands as that's sorely missing in lots of maine. -scarapella |
|
| 163580995 | Hi mynameisjonas, Thank you for your contribution to openstreetmap. By removing way/1348687617 from the relation/16875921 it has made that multi-polygon winter sports area invalid as the border is no longer closed. The iD editor should give a hint there when this happens. You can also see this error in some of the popular QA tools including:
Cheers,
|
|
| 160586802 | Hi, Additionally, you've removed highway=path from some sections such as the path from flagstaff hut to big eddy
Doing this means effectively that it's not long a path usable for hiking or biking. As you still have bicycle=yes
I think this is almost certainly not the behavior you intend. Cheers,
|
|
| 160586802 | Hello, Thank you for your contributions to openstreetmap. In this change set you removed the piste:type=nordic from a section of Poplar Stream Hurt Service Road
By doing this OSM based maps (gasiagps, Strava, onX, etc.) will no longer see this as a cross country trail. Since you kept piste:grooming tag and ski=yes I suspect this was not your intended outcome. Cheers
|
|
| 146011520 | Don’t think of me as bringing bad news. Think of me as bringing you another opportunity to edit OSM! ;-) |
|
| 146011520 | Hey Zelonewolf, Looks like this edit broke relation/13363410. Not sure how important or not the zip code boundaries are in OSM, but I noticed it so I thought I'd mention it. Anyway you are the boundary guy so I leave it to you to decide :-) Cheers,
|
|
| 147245614 | Hi Necessarycoot72. Thank you for your contributions to openstreetmap. I'm curious here if Black Island (way/1180048875) strictly speaking should be an inner of Thompsom Lake since it is connected to the shore by a causeway. |
|
| 153338110 | Thank you for your contribution to osm kisslstvan. Unfortunately it looks like you used an older (pre-2023) allgash wilderness waterway paper map to place the campsites. This map (and the current one in fact) has several campsites located incorrectly. Additionally since the publication of this campsite one of the campsites (East Twin Brook) was moved radically. I placed the campsites you created more or less at the right place.
Additionally I removed any duplicate elements I found (e.g. there were two long lake damp campsites in different locations.) -scarapella |
|
| 156346941 | Thank you for all your good work! I really appreciated all the nice work with strava you did in RMNP as I was doing edits. FWIW I figured out what I did here. The main change was just to add a bridge when as I was updating roughly the path of the river. When I did that I tweaked slightly a couple nodes around the bridge based on satellite. Since I was doing mostly river work and not trail work, I did the edit without thinking and didn't check strava. That's what I get for being too quick! Thanks again for cleaning up after me. |
|
| 156346941 | Yep, mea culpa. It was a bad edit on my part. Thanks for fixing. |
|
| 122827744 | I wish I had a clever reason to create a new value, but Occam's Razor rules. It was a typo. Thanks for catching it (and any other cases of my typos.) I updated this way already. |
|
| 147713469 | Hi htmoore, Thank you for you contribution to openstreetmap. I see as part of this change set you added this waterway=river way from saint john to digby.
it seems like you're trying to represent the Digby-Saint John Ferry route which is already well marked by this route=ferry way
cheers,
|
|
| 147239116 | Hello, thanks for making the update so quickly. I had another look today and it's close, but I think that this way
is an inner of this natural=wood multipolygon
when it should be an outer. Here's the osmi link
cheers,
|
|
| 147239116 | Greetings Necessarycoot72, I came across this changeset as part of the osmi qa tools flagged an duplicate segment error.
I think the issue is that way100223369 does not, and should not be included in as part of the Relation: Nicatous Lake (1433245) relation/1433245 because it is a peninsula and therefore the way is outside the lake area. Cheers,
|
|
| 145819774 | Hey @Adam Franco Thanks for pointing that out. I proposed that we should exclude the waterway link from the waterway length and end of waterway calculations since it's sole purpose is to have a route-able link for paddle routes. https://github.com/amandasaurus/waterwaymap.org/issues/34 In the meantime, i reversed this link as anyway it seems to be the convention created by quincylvania and it's functionally identical. cheers,
|
|
| 145040705 | I'll see you there then :-) I'm mostly in maine but i've been remiss in not joining the other new england channels. |
|
| 145040705 | thanks for the input. I was starting to go towards more track or path, then decided I didn't have enough on the ground info. so reverted to what was there previously pending some local inquiry (or someone who gets to it before I do.) |
|
| 144974949 | Yeah, since then name is the same and the tags don't overlap it makes sense. I merged the two areas in changeset/144980760 |