Meaculpa maxima, copy paste errors while air mapping

Please see access=private

Sorry, yes that's correct

thank you

Thank you

:) Keep up the great work! osm has a wiki which describes a lot of the keys=values that are useful, and I normally use an editor called JOSM when I want to edit a lot at once that's complex.

Happy mapping!

You might want to consider highway=secondary_link for unnamed turning lane systems and slip roads?

Good edit!

Thanks for your work on Tempe station!

I'm not sure about this. The object exists and is a verifiable amenity. Could you help me understand the rationale?

Thank you so much!

good work

I hate to note this about your edit, but Baptist Street's on road cycleways were already mapped as part of Baptist Street's way (cycleway=lane ; cycleway:lane=doorzone)!

Keep up the mapping when you can!

Cheers. Can fix. I remember mapping all the lanes left to right in the direction of the way, so easy to split into :forward…

Great work! But how do we deal with W1-1 and W1-1 having the same code but being left and right turns respectively?

Pebkac. Manual tagging and I forgot it was underscore. Will fix in Josm at home

Cheers mate for your work.

ramp:pram is a cultural error on my part. The ramps are called "pram ramps" in Australian road design, and the regular tag "ramp:stroller" is an Americanism. I will of course correct to common usage. It obviously represents a vehicle access suitability. Some motorised wheel chair users might be able to take them but they tend to be steeper than modern ramp:wheelchair requirements.

ups is the common way to refer to uninterruptible power supplies: a rather useful thing for emergency and disaster mapping in relation to powered devices like traffic signals. In the NSW mapping context some traffic light systems have ups capability and others are mains electricity dependent.

There is a class of infrastructure on the ground that can be coherently specified now. It is a non-transient permanent erection to building code or by state institutions. The infrastructure fills fairly basic physical needs. I am not seeing the problem. It is specified in relation to existing key structures and tags, not with a novel schematic. I am not not seeing the problem.

I'm mapping what is apparent on the ground and of interest. Like access to toilets meeting a mobility need. Or sharps bins. Half of the essential tagging for bicycle use doesn't exist in opencyclemap and I am not going to tag for render.

Cheers for your work. I often map mobile and haven't fully customised my editor.

ambulant = yes is modelled off wheelchair = yes

In Australian toilets a new access category of "ambulant" has developed recently catering to people with walkers, crutches, canes or other upright mobility differences. These toilet stalls are larger with "swing out" doors and often grips to allow the upright with mobility issues to more easily use toilet stalls.

Does that make sense from a tagging perspective? I can photo an ambulant stall and add it to wikimedia commons for consideration by editors who work on key and value consistency?

Massive cheers. Editing to match common style.