@ZeLonewolf: Are you respecting osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct ?

By which means do you choose the Wikipedia language to be kept?

Is node/9076542964 a building=entrance?

Please do use meaningful changeset comments and not always "GiS Source".

Why are you not straightening buildings (key "Q") to have 90° angles?

We can be 100% sure that railway=razed would the appropriate tag for such a feature.
The railway mappers usually trace with a diligence unknown to mechanical validators or casual HOT mappers.

Stop the hilarious changeset comments, please.

If you see school nodes like node/4227626890 may you please be so kind to extend them to an area?

Hi Federico,

is Río Muerto an official name?

>I use the iD editor
I would recommend JOSM, this can further increase your mapping efficiency.
>"add Fix Me requests"
Please not!

Thanks for retagging a broken relation. Do you autovalidator guys really don't care?

If you encounter bad buildings nearby please delete them. Viz: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=111840201

All the building footprints are garbage and getting replaced → changeset/112431889

Please first learn how to straighten things by pressing Q before uploading any further object.

railway=razed is mapped indeed all over the US without harming any other data customer, so Mashin's argument seems to be wrong.

Why are you adding some building duplicates?

IMHO only multipolygons would represent the gardens correctly.

Please do use meaningful changeset comments

OSM mappt aber alles, was existiert. Das Nichtrespektieren von access-Tags liegt außerhalb unseres Einflussbereichs.

Ockham's razor?