Source is "Mapillary"

Wrong changeset comment. The comment should be: `Updating turn restrictions in Washington DC using Mapillary imagery https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/187` and sourec is `Mapillary`

I have observed that in your recent changesets you have been deleting perfectly good buildings from OSM which are present in satellite imagery. Can you please give any reason why you have deleted these buildings? Also the changeset comment says "Mapping missing roads around Gurgaon,New Delhi"; while in reality you are deleting buildings. Can you change the changeset comment to better reflect your changes? Thank you.

Similar to our earlier discussion on this changeset: changeset/37848984, there are untagged roads also in this changeset. Examples: way/404712054/history, way/404712056/history.

Please review the entire area for any more untagged ways.

I am noticing that there are still untagged roads in the area. Examples: way/403894818/history, way/404712055/history, way/403894794/history.

These are only some of the ways. I am noticing some more untagged ways in your edits, not limited only to this changeset. Please recheck all your changesets thoroughly and give proper tags to the untagged ways using the documentation mentioned above.

Please go through osm.wiki/Map_Features to understand how to tag real world objects on OpenStreetMap.

This link osm.wiki/India:Tags/Highway can help you with tagging of highways.

Please fix these based on the documentation I have shared here.

Great mapping effort. I have some observations on your edits

Untagged roads:

way/403894809/history
way/403894821/history
way/403894811/history
way/403894805/history
way/403894827/history
way/403894824/history

Just some examples of the untagged ways. Many more ways are still missing `highway=*` tags in your edits.

Building mapping:

way/403894816/history

In this case individual buildings can be mapped, instead of having one area for the entire building society. Also no other tags are present here to identify it as a building.

Great work on getting the GPS traces of the area. Just an issue here. There is no need to tag the road names as `name=none`. If the streets have no names you can use this proposed tag: osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Noname#noname.3Dyes

As the source for this changeset, you have mentioned using "Aerial view from Google". In OSM, we don't use Google as a source for the data: osm.wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F. Can you please clarify the license for the "Google Aerial View"?

The entire stretch of the way: way/111050389/history has been marked with turn lanes which does not appear to be correct. Can you look into this once and verify it?

Can you tell me what did you mean to represent by the tag "Rec center- Around"? Did you mean to represent a road or a landuse?

There seems to be significant offsets between the building footprints in your changeset and those in Bing imagery. Can you please confirm and verify the source for your building edits and also the source date for the data?

I have observed your edit in this area specifically this way: way/369769205 which does not have any proper tags. Can you please check this way out and re tag with correct tags or maybe remove the way?

Thank you for the feedback and pointing the error out to me. It was an oversight on my part. Have removed the invalid building. The changes are reflected in this changeset: changeset/36628736

Realigned and added the building:
changeset/36126541

Deleted and edited the overlapping buildings:
way/386327054/history

Building extruded to match imagery:
way/385959897/history

Thank you for the feedback. Can you take a look at the changes made.
changeset/35939027

Thank you for the feedback. Have made the required changes.
changeset/35938814

Source: Mapbox and Bing