This edit may have been intended to be a personal note or bookmark, but you altered live OpenStreetMap data, changing the name of Brighton to "Brighton Alex". This was reverted in changeset/162491696

Using the longer version of the name in the brand tag seems quite reasonable to me, but without changing it in the Name Suggestion Index (NSI), it's quite likely to get changed back to just "Access" every time someone makes an edit with the web-based iD editor you're using. That and some other QA tools will suggest adding brand and other tags based on NSI.

If you need any help, please feel free to ask. I'm not one of NSI's maintainers, so I can't promise that it will get changed.

If you feel strongly that the value of the brand tag should be "Access Self Storage" rather just "Access", you will need to get the Name Suggestion Index project updated. You can either raise an issue in their Github project, or contribute a pull request changing this file: https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/blob/db2fabc82fb0725437c5c336f94ab2665e6a87c8/data/brands/shop/storage_rental.json#L23

I've re-added Middle Dock as the alt_name and old_name, as it's still likely to be referred to (and searched for) by that name.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

For places with London postcodes, the value of addr:city is London, corresponding to the post town.

The optional name of the suburb, in this case Neasden goes into addr:suburb

Phone numbers should be in international format, e.g. +44 20 xxxx xxxx

I've tweaked the tags for this branch in changeset/162464809

(Review requested)

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding your business to the map.

You will need to add tag(s) to tell data consumers what sort of business you are. If it's your office, you could add something like office=company (or another more appropriate value - see office=* )

If you need any help, please feel free to ask.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately, your added dragged parts of Vicarage Road, Felcot Road and a post box out of position. I have restored these in changeset/162448418

Please be more careful.

Thanks.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for updating the map around Hoo St Werburgh.

Unfortunately, you disconnected the path from from Vicarage Lane, which the iD editor warned you about.

You deleted two service roads which the aerial imagery shows still exists. In OSM, if an object still exists, it is considered good practice to apply the appropriate tags, in this case a driveway and a parking aisle. These have been undeleted and tagged accordingly.

Please could you also confirm whether the footpath (which is not a sidewalk, having no street of which it could be a sidewalk) to the NW of Church Farm Close is separated by a physical barrier? If not, why did you disconnect them?

Thanks, I saw your later changesets. I've added the ref:GB:usrn tags to the sections where we can be reasonably confident about the names. Some of the other segments will need to be picked up by local mappers when construction is complete. The presence of construction=* tags should prompt periodic checks by any StreetComplete users.

(Review requested)

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding this.

It's fine as it is, but if you wanted to add a little more detail to help routing software, you could add surface and incline tags. Links for the tags which might be useful are below. This is entirely optional, so please do not feel as if you need to change anything.

surface=*
smoothness=*
tracktype=*
incline=*

Thanks!

(Review requested)

Thanks for adding this, it looks fine to me.

You could add designation=permissive_footpath if you wanted, but it's not essential. The documentation of the tag is at designation=*#United_Kingdom

Are you sure that they shouldn't be highway=construction + construction=residential?

The roads may not yet be open to traffic, but both are in OS Open USRN (with Designated Street Name records) and OS Open Names, including some of the geometries you deleted.

USRN 1104116 - Andrew Cairns Drive
USRN 1104117 - Maud Allen Way

That's a relief, thanks.

@Nathan_A_RF this looks like a StreetComplete problem rather than user error. It might be worth raising an issue on Github if it happens again, but at the moment GB taginfo looks fine - https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/maxspeed:type#values

Thanks for fixing that!

You might find this Overpass Turbo query helpful:

// Fractured multipolygons touched by @mapeing / @demise123
rel
[type=multipolygon]
(if:id() != 6038068) // Great Britain
(if:count_by_role("outer") > 1)
(if:count_by_role("inner") == 0)
(uid_touched:21804930);

(._;>;);
out meta;

Changing it to building=apartments kept iD happy changeset/162303813

Thanks for fixing it.

It's likely to be related to this https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-edits-by-one-busmiles-user-in-the-uk/116376

I can't see any signage suggesting that these streets should be tagged as highway=living_street, which in the UK would be a TSRGD diagram 881 Home Zone sign (like this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Home_zone_Higham_on_the_Hill_Nuneaton_Dec_2019.jpg ).

I think this is likely to be a problem with how StreetComplete interpreted your response to the AddMaxSpeed quest, rather than something you did. I'll restore the streets to highway=residential.