Reverted.

Repaired in changeset/151141756

You haven't "changed the designation" here, you've deleted a running track correctly mapped as a multipolygon. I have reverted your changeset and updated the mapping of associated features.

You might find OpenStreetMap's documentation worth reading before you edit more running tracks.

sport=athletics

OpenStreetMap is a live public database, please don't use it for testing.

You may find these useful:
osm.wiki/Testing_changes_before_upload
osm.wiki/Sandbox_for_editing

Reverted in changeset/151140491

What was the source for this weight restriction?

Reverted. The features also exist on numerous sources of aerial imagery and other maps, from which you have no prospect whatsoever of having them removed.

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for updating this.

Although the street signs presumably say "Mardleywood", it might be worth adding an alt_name tag with "Mardley Wood" so that it turns up in searches. The latter form is also in OS Open Names, which would probably need help from your council to fix.

Please don't add unsigned (and therefore non-existent, at least in the UK) foot=no restrictions.

It's not the official website of the bridge, as it does not have one. Removed.

* how LLCS operates

Unfortunately, you appear to have misunderstood how LLCS exists and failed to check the actual signage in place.

For example, the signed restriction on Tower Bridge is a prohibition of goods vehicles exceeding 18 tonnes, i.e. goods vehicles with a maximum gross weight between 3.5 and 18 tonnes are permitted.

I can't find this order online, but it seems odd that a 20mph speed limit order should introduce both an absolute 7.5t weight limit and an HGV ban. Do you have a link to the original traffic order?

Please could you try to keep the extent of your changesets to a smaller geographical area? Ones with a bounding box which spans several continents (in this case W Africa to NE Asia) are very difficult to review.

osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Have all the parking spaces and the trees *really* been removed? If not, why have you deleted them from the map?

The pub is already mapped as a node separate from the building outline.

node/419960967

Thanks! I must shoot some Mapillary imagery around the Necropolis next time I'm up in Glasgow.

Stop trying to cheat at Pokemon Go and grow up.

It's been mapped for 15 years.
way/27051948

Duplicate deleted.

Dragged node repaired in changeset/150789041

Unfortunately, removing the highway=unclassified tag from part of Hedley Avenue effectively removed it from the map. Private roads are still roads, so this tag should not be removed. I am not sure what "no highway status" means, but Hedley Avenue is in OS Open Names and has a Designated Street Name USRN, so it will also be on OS maps and derived products.

Also, I can see from Bing's street side imagery that the entrance to Hedley Avenue is signed "private road". This means that it is privately owned, not that access is private. In this case, ownership=private + access=destination is probably the best tagging.

OSM data is used by navigation software, users of which would reasonably expect to get them to the gates of the premises to which they are travelling.

You may find the documentation for these tags on the wiki helpful:
highway=*
access=*
ownership=*

I have restored Hedley Avenue and added a little more information in changeset/150765919