You'd be amazed how many apartments there aren't on the Great Eastern Mainline.

More vandalism.

An imaginary apartment.

The real Cambridge Central Mosque is way/674380818

This is just vandalism.

I'll have a look to see if I can find out why it's trying to do that, but it might not be until Monday.

I did a quick test using the bicycle routing you on the OpenStreetMap website (right-click and select route to/from here), from the Green Man to Maryland Point. GraphHopper and Valhalla use the road as expected. OSRM does the same, apart from an unexpected detour around the back of Harrow Green.

I'm not sure how to revert a changeset in the iD editor you're using, so ,I've done it using JOSM.
changeset/139756308

Also, why routing service are you using? A cycle router should not attempt to send a bicycle along a highway=footway unless it also has bicycle=yes tag. Adding bicycle=no to a footway is often redundant, although it can be useful when there's an explicitly signed prohibition.

As it's an advisory lane which is part of the main carriageway, it's already tagged there, e.g.
cycleway:both=lane
cycleway:both:lane=advisory

Cycle lanes aren't rendered on the default map style (OSM Carto), but they are on CycleOSM, OpenCycleMap, etc.

I would suggest reverting your edit, as there isn't a separate cycle track along most of the length of Leytonstone Road.

Documentation on cycle lane tagging is linked below.
cycleway=lane
cycleway:lane=*

Please don't add leisure=park to landuse=grass and natural=wood areas, particularly if they area within an existing leisure=park polygon. What are you trying to achieve here?

Redundant park tags removed in changeset/139658356

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I'm afraid that a lot of your "corrections" are neither minor, nor correct.

St James's Park is already quite accurately mapped by dozens of other mappers and does not contain other parks.

Please could you try something less ambitious, edit fewer objects in a single changeset and use a less vague changeset comment?

I do not have the time to check every object you have edited, so in order to restore St James's Park to its original state quickly I have reverted your entire changeset in
changeset/139657417

Thanks for the clarification. One of those cases where it's easier to re-start from scratch?

That's a lot of deleted objects to be covered by a meaningless changeset comment. What are you trying to do here?

Thanks for spotting and fixing that.

Thanks for spotting this and updating the map. Unfortunately, you deleted the whole building, rather than just removing the tags relating to the café. I have reinstated the building, changing the tags for the business to:
disused:amenity=cafe
old_name=Pink Lemonade

Using a lifecycle prefix like disused:* rather than deleting an object preserves its edit history and also means that tools like StreetComplete will periodically prompt users to check whether the premises are still vacant.

osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Alternatively, you could have tagged it as area:highway=footway rather than highway=footway + area=yes. There's already a linear highway=footway, so the area surrounding it doesn't need to be routable.

area:highway=footway

Something flickering in StreetComplete doesn't seem like a justification to delete it.

osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

If they're visible in aerial or street side imagery, adding access=private might be better.

When objects are deleted because they're private, there's always the chance that they'll be added again from imagery, without any tags to indicate that they're private.

access=private

Please could you point me to where this mechanical edit was discussed?

osm.wiki/Automated_edits

Thanks - I meant to take a walk down there and check, but never got around to it.

@Thiskal thanks.

Please don't add fiction to the map.

Please use meaningful changeset comments.

#DWG