I see that you have added cycleway:right=share_busway to Lea Bridge Road (way/585538279) between Onra Road and Melbourne Road.

This section of road was mapped, by a mapper who has actually been there, as lanes=2 + cycleway=separate. As there are only two lanes for traffic and no PSV/bus lane mapped (because there isn't one any more), the undiscussed import of a historic feature without adequate checks is somewhat unhelpful to the quality and accuracy of the map.

#DWG

The cycle lanes which you added to Chobham Road (way/10818748) no longer exist, as examination of Bing aerial imagery and Mapillary clearly show.

The TfLCID data is now several years old and needs careful conflation wit existing OSM data, not an undiscussed import which overwrites mapping by contributors who have actually surveyed the infrastructure and checked the imagery.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/rskedgell?lat=51.549139944722&lng=-0.0030227655555556&z=17&pKey=176240357710782&focus=photo

#DWG

Thanks for changing the obsolete cuisine=vegan|vegetarian, but surely these should be replaced with diet:vegan|vegetarian=only in most cases?

That looks fine, thanks for updating it.

Hi, thanks for adding the LTN filter. It's probably worth adding the tag bicycle=yes to the pedestrian segment, assuming the restriction there is "no motor vehicles".

way/1070316703

The aquatics centre extends at least part of the way underneath the pedestrian area in order to accommodate the two training pools. Perhaps way/163734632 would be better tagged as building:part=yes than building=*

The street relation looked useful when I discovered it on the wiki, but a quick look at taginfo shows only 56 in GB, which may include the 21 I have just deleted.

Just out of interest, what was the query which pulled the street relations as well as the highway ways?

To be honest, I'd forgotten they existed! I think all the QA tools try to match addr:street on a POI with the name of the nearest highway=*. Hopefully they'll catch up with parentStreet etc. (if they haven't already).

The relations I created around Maryland are now history.
changeset/120900248

While I think the purpose of roles in the relations (which I created some time ago) has been misunderstood, I don't think associatedStreet relations are particularly useful in this area.

The relations are probably better off being deleted rather than remaining unmaintained and now broken.

What is your source for the spurious bicycle prohibition at the Hullbridge Road, South Woodham Ferrers bus gate? There was no prohibition in place on Saturday and local council minutes from 2021-07-07 mention a "bus and cycle sign" at E215 (this will be TSRGD diagram 953, with "taxi" omitted).
https://www.southwoodhamferrerstc.gov.uk/_UserFiles/Files/_Minutes/128321-20210707__Environment_Minutes_b.pdf

It's both an amenity and a building. While the use of the building has changed from an under-used exhibition space (tagged as tourism=attraction) to the new City Hall (amenity=townhall), it hasn't ceased to be a building. I swim in front of it regularly and will notice if that changes.

I have. They claimed not to have deleted the cycleway (!), so I undeleted those ways.

You may not have intended to delete it, but this changeset clearly shows that you did delete it. See (e.g.) v2 of way/826036636/history

Undeleted in
changeset/118594882

Has the cycleway crossing at the Lampton Road/Bath Road junction been physically removed?

The cycleway and crossing you added at the Lampton Road/Bath Road junction have just been deleted by @BorekSigar in changeset/118424018

As they already have form for deleting extant objects, I doubt the features have really been removed, but I won't have time to get over that way to check any time in the near future.

While there may have been overlapping natural=wood polygons, the names were not duplicates. What is your source for the names being "promoted" to the enclosing polygon - it certainly isn't the Maxar Premium Imagery cited in the changeset.

@nlme thanks for spotting and fixing this.

Why add layer=-1 to highways which clearly are not underground?

I've now added tags for species etc., although they should be checked by someone with more horticultural knowledge than me.