rskedgell's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 106464885 | Partly correct re: Queensberry Place, it's not a mini-roundabout (not sure why you tagged it as one, with a fixme saying it wasn't, or deleted the previous layout). It isn't a roundabout either, in the legal sense, just a circular section of road. Updated in changeset/106554110 |
|
| 106537845 | For the buildings between Wellington Road and Didsbury/Melbourne Road, there is already a surrounding landuse=residential area. They still need a building=* tag, e.g. building=apartments |
|
| 106533378 | Thanks, I'll update to the correct landuse=religious. |
|
| 104784520 | Thanks. I expect they'll remain in use if the Bow East concrete plant plans go ahead.
|
|
| 106423566 | ||
| 106423566 | Thanks for updating this. You could always use landuse=religion for the area surrounding a church (ideally matching the Land Registry boundaries, where available). A lot of the landuse polygons in this area are quite old and take a very broad brush approach. |
|
| 104784520 | The railway tracks between Bow East and the canal appear to be in use again - there was a freight train there when I cycled along the Greenway this afternoon. Are there any reasons I shouldn't reverse the disused status? |
|
| 106107811 | Thanks. The whole building had previously been tagged as leisure=swimming_pool. |
|
| 106059822 | Thanks for checking. I've added some extra tags in changeset/106060093 |
|
| 96737208 | Perhaps one of the suggestions here might work?
|
|
| 105688686 | No problem. Easily done and easily fixed. |
|
| 105688686 | You inadvertently dragged a service road connected to Leswin Place. Fixed in changeset/105691314 |
|
| 105473758 | Many thanks. I had no idea how best to tag it and seamark* isn't something I'm familiar with. |
|
| 105377711 | Thanks. I forgot to do that one. |
|
| 105149270 | No problem, I've undeleted it in changeset/105211075 |
|
| 105149270 | Has the zebra crossing on Rotherfield Street (SE of the junction with Elizabeth Avenue) really been completely removed, along with the associated speed table? |
|
| 104826325 | Is there any reason area:highway=* and highway=* + area=yes cannot co-exist, at least until OSM Carto renders area:highway? |
|
| 104658723 | Hi and many thanks for helping to update a neglected area of Newham! I'm based in Maryland, but haven't got any further than Hampton Road with detailed local mapping. You might find the "OSMUK Cadastral Parcels" overlay in iD useful for aligning the Bing aerial imagery and finding property boundaries. There's also the StreetComplete app (Android only) which can be useful to fill in extra information while walking around the area, like housenumbers, building height and street details. It also lets you add a note with a photograph for you or another mapper to pick up later on. If there's anything I can help with, please feel free to ask. |
|
| 103154845 | Voting suggests otherwise.
|
|
| 103977948 | Historic England disagree. Please revert. https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1081040 |