Oh, joy. In other words, is_in=* is dead, long live is_in=* ?

I'm sure that works very well in more sensible countries where the postal and administrative boundaries align. It would certainly make life easier for the Nominatim maintainers if it worked in the UK.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding this (and all the benches in other changesets).

There's a specific tag in OSM if you want to add details of an inscription, inscription=* which might be a better fit here than description=*

Happy mapping!

Thanks for confirming - I've restored the building in changeset/176098426

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Could I jest check that you only meant to remove the tags relating to Oxford Centre for Innovation from the building between New Road and Tidmarsh Lane? You've deleted the whole building, but as long as it's still there I can easily undelete it.

If you're going to add separately mapped sidewalks, please could you remember to update the tagging on the parent street from sidewalk=both to sidewalk:both=separate ?

Thanks.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately, deleting the turn restriction relations has the effect that they no longer apply to any transport mode, rather than having an exception for buses and taxis. Instead of deleting them, you could have changed the tag except=bus to except=bus;taxi

Do you know when Westminster City Council made the traffic order(s) changing these restricted turns from bus only to bus and taxi?

I see you've added separate sidewalks to a few streets in this area, but haven't changed the tagging on the parent street from sidewalk=both to sidewalk:both=separate

It's also a little unhelpful that footway=crossing ways extend to the intersection of the footway=sidewalk ways, rather than just to the kerb. As a result of this, when people survey this area using tools like StreetComplete, they will not be prompted to supply all the information about kerb height and tactile paving which could otherwise have been collected. Mapping pedestrian infrastructure while limiting the scope to record accessibility features does somewhat reduce its value for pedestrian, wheelchair and visually impaired routing.

As this appears to be an anonymous MapRoulette activity, I have no idea what the project instructions are, although there should be a link in the changeset tags.

* Sorry! You'd add bicycle:signed=yes as well as bicycle=no where there's an explicit and signed prohibition.

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If you have a path which is tagged as highway=footway then adding bicycle=no and horse=no isn't necessary as that's implicit in the UK. It doesn't do any harm to add these tags, but they're unlikely to have any effect on routing software. The exception is where a prohibition is explicitly signed, in which case you can make this clear by also adding bicycle:signed=no (the StreetComplete surveying app does this).

osm.wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#United_Kingdom

(Review requested)

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately, this edit deleted the tag ( man_made=survey_point ) from the trig pillar on Iping Common which tells data consumers what sort of map feature it is. I've reverted this in changeset/175945440

If you're making edits which don't relate to a particular HotOSM project, please change the auto-generated comment to reflect what you're actually doing. You may find osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments helpful.

Reverted in changeset/175916881

Reverted in changeset/175916789

Reverted in changeset/175916479

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please note that access tags in OSM reflect the verifiable legal position, not your subjective opinion.
access=*

You can give pedestrian routers more information which might help. The 50 mph speed limit is already tagged, but you could also survey and add:
sidewalk=*
verge=*
lanes=*
lit=*

Reverted in changeset/175916430

The museum has already been added to OSM, but only 2 months ago: node/13256051041

This is the second time you have added a duplicate of Moco. Deleted in changeset/175865528

That's great, thanks for confirming.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding your business. I've converted the tags which you used to ones which are more likely to be recognised by data consumers.

It may be worth taking a look at the list of documented service types on the wiki and adding those which are missing. I've only added service:vehicle:towing=yes
service:vehicle:=**

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Thanks for adding this, but Buckland Primary School has been in OSM since 2012.
way/162902344

When you make an edit which isn't directly related to HotOSM, please could you replace the generated changeset comment with something actually describing the change(s) you're making?

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Does the deleted "Woodland Walk" path ( way/1099920175/history ) no longer exist at all, or is it no longer part of a signposted walk at Uppark and/or currently closed to the public?

If it's closed to the public, using an access tag would be the usual way to map this.

There's more information at osm.wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/National_Trust_Paths