Would service=alley also apply to these roads?

service=alley

Has the business moved to 176 Westbourne Grove and if so, is Martin Moore still at that address?

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately, your edit dragged part of Crown Avenue to the far side of Clarke Crescent, which I have reverted.

If you could explain what you were trying to do, I'd be more than happy to help.

Please could you explain why you deleted the short footway link (way/172888893) between Savage Gardens and the footway in Beckton Park?

Connecting it only to a short section of decorative sidewalk, which is not itself connected to any other highway made that entrance to the park unreachable for pedestrian navigation.

Link undeleted in changeset/172944855

(Review requested)

There doesn't seem to be much consistency for tagging arches in the wiki (see osm.wiki/Arch ).

It might be worth asking in the OSM Community Forums for tagging suggestions ( https://community.openstreetmap.org/ ).

* this is actually Banbury Park (BP) CPZ

You accidentally dragged the north side of the roundabout across Trafalgar House. It's quite easy to do this without realising in web-based editors like iD and Rapid. However, the editor would have warned you about highways crossing buildings and other highways before you saved your edit.

Hopefully fixed in changeset/172457979

Many thanks for checking this and resolving my note. Could I just check which sign is in use here?

maxweight=*#United_Kingdom

(Review requested)

If a business has closed, simply deleting the name tag will not convey this information to data consumers.

In this case, it will still appear on maps as a caravan site, but with its name missing.

One way to achieve this is to move the name to old_name and use a lifecycle prefix on the "main" tag. In this case, you could change tourism=caravan_site to disused:tourism=caravan_site

osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Also, your changeset comment is REPORTED CLOSED, but you haven't given a source. Where was the closure reported?

Sorry for my slow response. You could always add the tagging for an artwork and leave the memorial tagging in place, if that would allow you to describe it in more detail.

Access changed to access=private in way/837344032

(Review requested)

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your edit.

Rather than deleting the name tag here, it might be better to use a lifecycle tag and change tourism=caravan_site to disused:tourism=caravan site. That way, data consumers will not treat it as if it were still open, but will be able to see what it was.

Assuming that you surveyed this yourself, you could also add a check_date tag.

osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
check_date=*

No, that was a fat finger error on my part. Thanks for spotting it, removed in changeset/172278492

(Review requested)

You can tag multiple values for material separated by semicolons, see
osm.wiki/Multiple_values

Would this be better tagged as an artwork rather than as a memorial?
tourism=artwork

Although this doesn't tell us what any structural weight limit on the bridge is (unlikely to be a standard road sign), or whether it's tonnes or tons (lt).

I've added ownership=private and treated the goods vehicle weight limit and width restriction as if the signs were on public roads. I suppose it also ought to be access=permissive, unless there's a PRoW?

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for all the edits you're making around Barking.

When a business or amenity is no longer in use, as an alternative to using 'disused' as a key, there's also the option of using it as a lifecycle prefix, e.g. 'healthcare=doctor' -> 'disused:healthcare=doctor'.
osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

(Review requested)

Looks fine to me, thanks for fixing the typo.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for spotting and correcting this.

According to OS Open USRN, there may be another arm of Wesley Drive going SW between the vicarage and White's Road. That doesn't necessarily mean it's been built or will ever get build, but are you local enough to check?

Hi @Intrigued and thanks for adding these new weight restrictions.

I've changed these to maxweightrating:hgv=7.5, as the weight restriction in the traffic order and corresponding signs is for "goods vehicles having a maximum gross weight of over 7.5 tonnes" and all goods vehicles ≥ 3.5t are HGVs.

There's been some ambiguity in the past over how to tag weight restrictions in the UK and tagging schemes have evolved over time, but hopefully the wiki now reflects the current position.

changeset/172128787