rskedgell's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 147825024 | Deleting something added correctly by a competent mapper and replacing it with lower quality mapping is essentially vandalism and far more detrimental than your usual habit of adding duplicates. Reverted. |
|
| 147827171 | Repaired in changeset/164181748 |
|
| 147822414 | Repaired in changeset/164181626 |
|
| 147822251 | Repaired in changeset/164181494 |
|
| 147822508 | Repaired in changeset/164181362 |
|
| 147690524 | Repaired in changeset/164180998 |
|
| 147822893 | Repaired in changeset/164180913 |
|
| 147823076 | Already mapped correctly as relation/14028718
|
|
| 163966782 | Done in changeset/164175528 |
|
| 164130426 | Reverted in changeset/164170120 |
|
| 164130501 | Reverted in changeset/164170120 |
|
| 164130604 | Reverted in changeset/164170120 |
|
| 164130924 | Reverted in changeset/164170120 |
|
| 164130995 | Reverted in changeset/164170120 |
|
| 164132242 | Reverted in changeset/164170120 |
|
| 164132411 | Reverted in changeset/164170120 |
|
| 164130426 | Already mapped correctly as relation/13401608 The grass infield isn't a running track. I remember it quite distinctly from the last time I ran there. |
|
| 164130501 | Already mapped as relation/2723886 |
|
| 164130604 | Already mapped as relation/2725261 (although neither the inner member of the relation nor your duplicate accurately separate the 400m inner boundary of the running track from the jumps area) |
|
| 164130924 | Already mapped as relation/1634345 (although it has an unusual value for the surface tag) |