They're in that changeset if you look at the history of individual objects, but for some reason OSMCha is only highlighting the change to the road.

See (e.g. ) versions 4 and 5 of way/1117797720/history

Many thanks.

This is a live database and map, not the place for you to experiment. There is a sandbox for that purpose.

osm.wiki/Sandbox_for_editing

Reverted in changeset/140583649

Thanks. I hadn't noticed that SC/SCEE only resolves the construction=* tag, but not construction:* lifecycle tags. It might be worth raising an issue on the StreetComplete Git repository.

(Sadly, there's no point me doing it, there is exactly zero chance of the developer implementing any issue or pull request I raise.)

Are these roads actually private access (typically gated), or private ownership (unadopted roads owned by the property developer)?

If it's the latter, tagging as ownership=private + access=destination may be a better fit, as they should be available to routing software for visitors, deliveries, taxis, etc.

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for updating the map.

If the pétanque terrain is separate from the bowling green, you could consider adding it with the following tags:

leisure=pitch
sport=boules
boules=petanque

boules=petanque

HGVs start at 3.5t, not 7.5t.

Reverted in changeset/140481678

Unfortunately, by the time this edit reaches a lot of routing services, the ferry will already have reopened. It's not worth using disused:* for such a short-term closure for that reason. If a closure is known about long enough in advance, a conditional access restriction could be used.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I'm not sure what you were hoping to achieve here, but I'll try to help if I can.

There's no need to add additional parks within a park which has already been mapped, as Plumstead Common is already mapped as a multipolygon relation:
way/262748978

A park shouldn't normally be mapped as a node, but as an area. The documentation on the wiki is here:
leisure=park

Many thanks for the reassurance and good luck with your project.

Removing the layer=-1 tags set by Waymap's @alisonlung would help. They appear to have been added because she didn't know or care what she was doing. It took a long time to undo her more damaging and pointless edits.

Please could you confirm whether or not this is part of an organised editing activity by or on behalf of Waymap?

Where a sidewalk goes around the corner into another street, you need to split it before setting the name tag(s), otherwise turn-by-turn instructions will be unhelpful (e.g. junction of Devonport Road Scotts Road).

It would also be helpful if you added or updated sidewalk tagging on the road itself.
sidewalk=*

* Buckingham Road, not Bicester Road

I wonder if this could be a bug in iD? Presumably the edited node was intended to be somewhere in Kota Kinabalu rather than British Columbia?

Was the deleted public footpath LB Croydon FP 127 incorrectly mapped, or has it been formally stopped up or informally obstructed?

@AndersAndersson The only beneficiary of this vandalism is the Russian side. If the operator of these sock puppet accounts is actually Ukrainian, they're collaborating.

@basilEed1524 by damaging an open source project you're more likely to erode support for the Ukrainian side. I'll assume that you are either a Russian, or a collaborator.

As you're reverting them, nobody is going to worry about the odd typo or speling mitsake :-)

Reverted.

Reverted