rskedgell's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 139657368 | Please don't add leisure=park to landuse=grass and natural=wood areas, particularly if they area within an existing leisure=park polygon. What are you trying to achieve here? Redundant park tags removed in changeset/139658356 |
|
| 139650253 | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I'm afraid that a lot of your "corrections" are neither minor, nor correct. St James's Park is already quite accurately mapped by dozens of other mappers and does not contain other parks. Please could you try something less ambitious, edit fewer objects in a single changeset and use a less vague changeset comment? I do not have the time to check every object you have edited, so in order to restore St James's Park to its original state quickly I have reverted your entire changeset in
|
|
| 139626415 | Thanks for the clarification. One of those cases where it's easier to re-start from scratch? |
|
| 139626415 | That's a lot of deleted objects to be covered by a meaningless changeset comment. What are you trying to do here? |
|
| 139605537 | Thanks for spotting and fixing that. |
|
| 139540352 | Thanks for spotting this and updating the map. Unfortunately, you deleted the whole building, rather than just removing the tags relating to the café. I have reinstated the building, changing the tags for the business to:
Using a lifecycle prefix like disused:* rather than deleting an object preserves its edit history and also means that tools like StreetComplete will periodically prompt users to check whether the premises are still vacant. |
|
| 139362495 | Alternatively, you could have tagged it as area:highway=footway rather than highway=footway + area=yes. There's already a linear highway=footway, so the area surrounding it doesn't need to be routable. Something flickering in StreetComplete doesn't seem like a justification to delete it. |
|
| 139363243 | If they're visible in aerial or street side imagery, adding access=private might be better. When objects are deleted because they're private, there's always the chance that they'll be added again from imagery, without any tags to indicate that they're private. |
|
| 139324196 | Please could you point me to where this mechanical edit was discussed? |
|
| 139312750 | Thanks - I meant to take a walk down there and check, but never got around to it. |
|
| 139302894 | @Thiskal thanks. |
|
| 139301859 | Please don't add fiction to the map. Please use meaningful changeset comments. #DWG |
|
| 139302894 | Everything else this vandal has added also needs to be deleted #DWG |
|
| 139301731 | Please don't add nonsense to the map. Please use a meaningful changeset comment. |
|
| 139301345 | Please use a meaningful changeset comment. |
|
| 139302894 | Please don't add fiction to the map. There is not a branch of McDonald's on the Ward Hunt Ice Shelf or a small forest in China. Please use meaningful changeset comments. Please confine the geographical extent of your edits to an area which does not spam continents. |
|
| 139039813 | Thanks for updating this. I've changed it to disused:amenity=toilets Using a tag like closed=yes is generally considered unhelpful, as it effectively negates the main tag.
|
|
| 139038693 | The grass area is clearly part of James Clavell Square, so the extent of relation/15926523 is clearly too small. It's quite hard to determine the correct extent of the square, even if you've actually been there:
I'll review it again next time I go there. |
|
| 32224313 | Re: fixme about the purpose of the building by the lake in Beckton District Park (way/41151618) - it was a café and toilets, disused for years. |
|
| 138964868 | Thanks for updating this, but please don't remove the building=* tag unless the building has actually gone. |