I'm surprised to see that the US Embassy "moat" has been replaced by a car park. When did that happen?

OpenStreetMap is a real world map, used by routing services. Please don't add imaginary features with tags you clearly do not understand.

Reverted in changeset/134858461

The gate was already (and correctly) tagged as access=private, why change it to access=no?

You could add locked=yes if that seems appropriate.
locked=*

Unfortunately, continuous=yes + sidewalk=yes was never discussed or documented, so no data consumer would have processed these tags without a highway=crossing tag, even if they had been connected to highway=* ways.

This is fortunate, as many (or even most) of the "side road entry treatments" surveyed for TfLCID are not continuous sidewalks, but normal pedestrian crossings with a speed table and/or flush kerbs.

Importing barriers without attempting to ascertain the barrier type or correct access tags from the available aerial and streetside imagery is unhelpful. On the plus side, as they were not connected to highway=* ways, no routing errors resulted from incorrect access tags.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121239871

Importing barriers without attempting to ascertain the barrier type or correct access tags from the available aerial and streetside imagery is unhelpful. On the plus side, as they were not connected to highway=* ways, no routing errors resulted from incorrect access tags.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121238847

Importing barriers without attempting to ascertain the barrier type or correct access tags from the available aerial and streetside imagery is unhelpful. On the plus side, as they were not connected to highway=* ways, no routing errors resulted from incorrect access tags.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121232553

We enjoyed those sections a few weeks ago. Luckily we were all wearing trail or fell running shoes and got away with nothing worse than damp socks. Ideal footwear for that section of the New River Path is probably 15mm cross country spikes at the moment :-)

Thanks! I'm walking the last bit of the Capital Ring with friends tomorrow, so this has saved us an unnecessary detour.

Importing barriers without attempting to ascertain the barrier type or correct access tags from the available aerial and streetside imagery is unhelpful.

On the plus side, as they were not connected to highway=* ways, no routing errors resulted from incorrect access tags.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121204541

Importing barriers without attempting to ascertain the barrier type or correct access tags from the available aerial and streetside imagery is unhelpful.

On the plus side, as they were not connected to highway=* ways, no routing errors resulted from incorrect access tags.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121203718

Importing barriers without attempting to ascertain the barrier type or correct access tags from the available aerial and streetside imagery is unhelpful.

On the plus side, as they were not connected to highway=* ways, no routing errors resulted from incorrect access tags.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121230962

I have deleted a lot of these now that the TfLCID import appears to have been quietly abandoned. It will take a long time to fix the damage caused by dumping data into OSM without checking the available imagery.

Someone got *paid* for this...
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121193281

Since the access tags on this are wrong (there are TSRGD diagram 617 "no vehicles" signs either side), it is fortunate that the node for RWG072783 was not actually connected to a highway and consequently did not cause bicycle routing errors.

Would the green roof here be better tagged with green_roof=yes + roof:material=* rather than, or in addition to, roof:colour=*

green_roof=*

What does "bedzed" have to do with deleting a tree which another mapper surveyed? Has it been cut down?

Even after 3660 previous edits, you replaced the traffic_calming=choker tag surveyed and mapped by another user with the non-specific and useless to routers traffic_calming=yes? Why?

Available aerial imagery and the photographs provided by the TfL surveyors for TfLCID don't leave much ambiguity:
https://cycleassetimages.data.tfl.gov.uk/RWG271649_1.jpg
https://cycleassetimages.data.tfl.gov.uk/RWG271649_2.jpg

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and many thanks for adding this vegan café.

The cuisine=vegan tag isn't really used any more and has been replaced by diet:vegan=only or diet:vegan=yes (as applicable).

The diet:vegan=* (and corresponding diet:vegetarian=*) tag is used by OpenVegeMap, Veggikarte.de, StreetComplete, etc.

diet:vegan=*

Rob

Removed in changeset/134556852

Duplicates removed in changeset/134556703