scuffed changeset comment

Please stop. I'm not sure what 'line' you are changing to 'natural=coastline', but you are adding coastline tags where there is no coast for at least 200 miles.

I'm going to try to remove this and hopefully it doesn't flood Canada or something.

why did you add hundreds of useless address tags to nodes?

definitely should have been reverted but it's too mixed up now

Hi,
Why did you make this change? I had just created a boundary relation that includes this and a bunch more ways that you missed by just changing the tags on this.

Fixed in changeset #92779234

Hi,
Please be aware of the imagery dates you are using. Esri/NYS in this area are from 2015. A lot has changed since then.
way/833339235 for example, does not exist anymore; check out NAIP imagery which shows the new Aldis which you mapped over.

*Language name without default name

Hi,
Are you aware of the poor quality that comes with importing the MS building dataset? For example, the following buildings do not exist anymore
way/842901556
way/842901557
way/842716857

Some have the MS buildings source tags while others do not; if you are tracing from the Esri Clarity layer please be aware that it is from 2010 and much has changed.

It looks like the capture date for this area is actually 2017, and for the westernmost four islands of Adam's Bridge it is sometime before 2016.

Hey b-jazz,
I couldn't find me in the PeWU history of the streams, so I think what happened is that I moved the coastline and a stream wasn't downloaded.
Thanks for the fix, it looks good now. Another mapper removed a couple of them.
Will

It appears to be from May 29 2020, according to https://discover.digitalglobe.com, though that may not be the exact date the image was taken.

huge bounding box is because I touched the Intracoastal Waterway I guess?

Hi,
please use descriptive changeset comments! It helps other mappers understand what you did at a glance. An empty comment does little to explain this changeset spanning the whole east coast.

Hi,
What is the source for these changes?

Since you haven't responded and I cannot find any evidence of existing secondary-like road here, I've downgraded that segment to track and changed most of the rest of this 'turnpike' to tertiary.
I kept the turnpike name in the `old_name` tag to be more accurate.

It seems that this turnpike is only historical, and does not really exist anymore (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_turnpikes_in_Virginia_and_West_Virginia). I'm interested to know where you're getting this data since it's not on the USGS maps.

All good, I saw La Salle first and got confused.

Hi,
please check your changeset comments before submitting; this is no longer Peru unless I'm mistaken.

Lots of deletion presumably because people are moving into the towns.

Hi,
Why did you expand this residential area (way/676443710) to cover commercial buildings instead of the apartment complex it is intended for?
Thanks

*ADDING WATER