Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please be more careful when removing things in the future. Several streams that definitely do exist were deleted, and the boundary for the Town of Boone was edited as a result.

So is the mountain area a property boundary or just a wooded area? natural=wood is used for mapping landcover, not landuse areas.

What data source(s) are you using? There's a lot listed on the wiki for potential sources for Canada.

Reverted in changeset #119916479

Please revert these changes if you can. The imagery you used is several years out of date; those paths do not exist and the building was already mapped properly as a construction area.

I removed them because they are not useful data. We already have the outline of the Wayne NF there. Should we just add random blocks of woods everywhere because they're not incorrect?

What source are you using for the roads? Are you tracing the Bing imagery found in iD or actually tracing Bing Maps?

So since we agree on a coastline we can work on beach mapping. I have no problem with mapping the low-tide beach (I like the idea of it being separate with a tidal tag), but what I removed were not parts of any real beach. They extended several hundred feet into the ocean, which is just not realistic. This is similar to the beaches you added at north Pea Island (see node/8544312354) which go 200-600ft into the water (from high tide).

You can try to pull a high tide line out of the imagery but I'm telling you it is correct. Those cars are about ten feet above (vertical) the ocean. The high tide line is in front of them. A quick check of the tide chart also shows that it was near high tide when the image was taken

natural=reef can be sand, not only coral. Diamond Shoals is fine; we can't really map further out anyway since the imagery is clipped.

I was referring to 999347893 and 999347892. The coastline and other changes you made also were not consistent.

Sure every beach is always partly submerged, but you added several hundred feet of beach beyond the coastline, which isn't there. And the coastline didn't match Cape Point on any of the imagery I can see so I was curious if you had used some other source.

Also a lot of your other edits in the area seem inconsistent; is there a different imagery source you're using?

Hi, why did you add these beaches in the water? They don't appear on any imagery we have, and certainly not Esri.

And actually looking at the Wikipedia page it looks like there's not even a wetland reserve there, its private property?

Is there a reason that Wetlands Reserve in TN is broken up into so many little bits?

This was never actually followed up on and much of the woods still look like good candidates for complete redrawing

Offsets used: Bing (-1.71, 5.6), Maxar (-2.08, 8.19)

It is a work in progress, like some other areas of landcover

The correct tag for these roads is highway=track. They don't really resemble driveways when they are just tire tracks leading to an oil rig, if anything. Many of them don't even exist anymore

Why did you tag so many things as driveways? Hardly any of these roads look like they actually lead to anything.