Please STOP changing motorways to trunk routes if they are state highways in the Orlando area. These are 100% true motorways, as they are limited access, and toll highways. You are damaging the map.

It also seems that they have Electric Avenue (for now) closed WB with the detour route they suggest here: http://www.wtae.com/article/residents-being-evacuated-after-apartment-building-collapse-near-route-30/19709050 But can't be 100% on that.

And here's a news article link for anybody interested in seeing exactly what happened: http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2018/04/07/apartment-collapses-near-route-30-landslide/

Changeset has been reverted in 56297875 (changeset/56297875), after talking with the user in a PM.

Why did you delete the ref tags along the Belt routes? They are posted, especially on Duncan Avenue. I would recommend a complete revert here to restore them.

Why did you delete the ref tags along the Belt routes? They are posted, especially on Ingomar Road. I would recommend a complete revert here to restore them.

Hello katycat5e. I noticed that in this changeset, you added the 'PA' tag to the ref tag on the PA-51 relation. The 'ref' tag in highway relations is only for the route number, as the 'state' part is in the 'network' tag. I only noticed this just now since I saw the '51' shields missing inside of OSMAnd, while every other route was just fine. OSMAnd uses the relations to add the proper highway shields to the map, and with that 'PA' in the ref tag of the relation, it broke their process on that route, leaving it shield-less. I've gone ahead and fixed this in changeset/56254508 (changeset/56254508). Just thought you'd like to know this so you can avoid this mistake again in the future. :)

Paul, I honestly wouldn't be calling out others as 'sockpuppet' accounts unless you have 100% proof. It's very unprofessional for 1 thing, and very rude at the minimum. If you want to say it in your head, that's one thing, but don't post in public saying that unless you can back it up with 100% proof. Stuff like that should be left for the Mods/Admins here @ OSM to do, since they would have the IP logs for the edits, something you don't have access to as far as I know.
=====
As for the subject on hand, if the two signs you mention are very small green signs, I'm 99.9% sure it's just a 'Honorary' name for this segment, and not the real name of the highway. Take for example, this 'Rick Cessar Highway' sign ( https://goo.gl/maps/Tyrtcgmr9Wk ) on PA-8 is 100% honorary (no personal pic, but could get one if necessary), as the real name for the road in this area is 'William Flynn Highway' (posted on street blades @ intersections), and it's correctly tagged as such in OSM. From all the evidence people have been posting above, I'm honestly in the belief that the real name of this is indeed 'Creek Turnpike', and not 'Liberty Parkway' as you claim. Do you have any proof that the 'Liberty Parkway' name is on any BGS as of right now, as that's the only way I could personally see you having a leg to stand on in reference for the name tag along the way(s) themselves. Otherwise, the 'Liberty Parkway' name should be in a different tag, like 'name:honorary', IMO. But to be fully honest here Paul, I think you're in a loosing battle. The evidence does seem to be very stacked against ya here.

Whoops, forgot the news article link: http://www.wpsdlocal6.com/2017/11/22/69-progress-make-better-2018-holiday-travels/

Do you have any 'proof' that I-69 has been posted South of I-24 yet? The following article pretty much says it HASN'T been posted yet, but will be next year, but only down as far as Wingo (Exit #14). So, do you have any photographic proof of the shields being up (Future Corridor signage doesn't count)?

I-42 isn't posted yet, and thus shouldn't be in the ref tag yet.

The FHWA hasn't approved it any farther than that yet.

Heads up, but I-87 will only go as far as the US-64 Business / NC-97 interchange (New Bern Aveune).

http://surewhynotnow.blogspot.com/2017/09/goodbye-interstate-495-hello-interstate.html
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/traffic/article171521622.html

Hello Silvertronica. Unfortunately, this segment, while in the future will become I-87, isn't part of I-87 yet. I-87 will be officially ending @ US-64 Business / NC-97's interchange at this time.

So, I recommend removing the I-87 lines from these two ways.

Here's a link to a news article about this.
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/traffic/article171521622.html

I don't think real I-587 shields have been posted yet. Do you have any proof of them being posted? As far as I know, none of it's route is Interstate standard yet because of shoulder issues, which prevents it from being posted as I-587.

I've noticed in this changeset that you removed all the 'A1A' mentions along the Bennett Causeway. Was this in error, as I thought A1A was signed with 528 in this area.

Is the building still there? If so, all that should have been deleted was the bank related tags.

Forgot the 'h' at the end of "Pittsburgh". Otherwise, looks correct now.

Ways 413903593 ( way/413903593 ) & 19322510 ( way/19322510 ) should have the 'destination' & 'destination:ref' changed to "destination=Pittsburgh", "destination:ref=I 376 East", & "destination:ref:to= I 76;Penna Turnpike" if anything.

Sorry, but you still haven't added it to the correct way. way/413903593 shouldn't have been changed. The info should have been added to way/55455970 ( way/55455970 ). That is the exit ramp here, as it's a LEFT exit from I-376 and should have the 'US 422' destination info.