I'm curious, but where did you get your info that it's signed as US-220?

It's been reported as signed as I-73/I-74, and US-220 remained on it's original route into Rockingham to end @ US-1 still.

See this post: https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?msg=2966375

Just an FYI, the ref tag on the node should have been left alone here, as it's needed by some routers.

I've gone ahead and restored it. ;)

Please don't add 'unsigned' highway route numbers in the 'ref' tag.

SR-32 is hidden under US-25 and not signed. When tagging an unsigned route number, it goes in the 'unsigned_ref' tag.

Word of advice then, make sure you either right away add your source as a comment after submitting the changeset, or put it in the changeset description.

This allows the other mappers to know where you got them from. ;)

Have you travel on this yet?

Your source doesn't say it opened in November at all. All it says "While the road will be opening soon", meaning it isn't opened yet.

There's been no press releases, no news articles posted saying it's been opened yet.

See: https://www.newsbreak.com/union-city-tn/3254157343707-union-city-s-690-roadway-paving-the-path-to-economic-prosperity-and-connectivity

The following news article mentioned it was nearing completion was posted on Dec 5th, which was the day the day the changeset being reverted marking it opened was done.

https://www.newsbreak.com/union-city-tn/3254157343707-union-city-s-690-roadway-paving-the-path-to-economic-prosperity-and-connectivity

Reverted in Changeset: 144886435 till there's official word that this has been opened to traffic.

The following news article mentioned it was nearing completion was posted the same day this original changeset marking it opened was done.

https://www.newsbreak.com/union-city-tn/3254157343707-union-city-s-690-roadway-paving-the-path-to-economic-prosperity-and-connectivity

Is there a news article out saying the the Union City bypass is open yet? If not, this changeset should be reverted till it's officially open.

See: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=154279450827345&lat=30.6707583&lng=-81.4586556&z=17&x=0.4858633597467215&y=0.5249798045355133&zoom=0&focus=photo

Or even maybe 'highway=trunk' + 'expressway=yes'?

I don't even think KYTC considers it as a 'controlled-access road'.

I loaded up the official 2022-23 map on their website and looked at the area of KY-3174. They put 3174 in the "Other highways; State Secondary" category. Meaning, they don't even consider it a 'motorway'.

https://transportation.ky.gov/Planning/Official%20Highway%20Map/2022-23%20-%20Official%20Highway%20Map.pdf

Based on that, I would think 'trunk' is more appropriate. Especially if bicycles are allowed on the road.

However, are there any other KYTC maps that show it as 'controlled-access'? If so, maybe 'highway=trunk' + 'motorroad=yes' would be more appropriate here?

motorroad=*#United_States

Here's even an official post from KYTC. It can't be I-69 till the earliest @ December 15, 2024, and that's if the FHWA signs off on the upgrades as being acceptable as Interstate standard. https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/KYTC/bulletins/34f19bf

Even better link: https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/KYTC/bulletins/34f19bf

I'm sorry, but you're wrong. FHWA MUST sign off on all Interstates before they are posted, as they need to be up to current Interstate standards. Construction @ Exits 1, 2 & 14 must be completed before KYTC can even talk to the FHWA to even post I-69 between Exits 1 & 21. This is planned for possibly the end of 2024. 'Future Corridor I-69' signage doesn't = "ref=I 69".

https://spectrumnews1.com/ky/louisville/news/2022/12/02/work-to-begin-on-purchase-parkway-extension

I'm sorry, but you're wrong. FHWA MUST sign off on all Interstates before they are posted, as they need to be up to current Interstate standards. Construction @ Exits 1, 2 & 14 must be completed before KYTC can even talk to the FHWA to even post I-69 between Exits 1 & 21. This is planned for possibly the end of 2024. 'Future Corridor I-69' signage doesn't = "ref=I 69".

https://spectrumnews1.com/ky/louisville/news/2022/12/02/work-to-begin-on-purchase-parkway-extension

than** a true 'motorway'. (Man, do I wish we'd have a small grace time to edit comments here.)

I'm curious, but why do you think 'Corridor Q' here is a 'motorway'? I think it's 'trunk' at the highest, due to it having several at-grade intersections. I think it's more comparable to US-19 in WV along Corridor L, as well as Corridor H (US-48) that a true 'motorway'.

And please use a more descriptive change message. "changed everything listed" isn't a good message, and doesn't help other users to be able to figure out what has been changed easily.

Just so you know, I-69 doesn't go South of Exit 21 yet. FHWA hasn't signed off on it south of there. Thus, it's still the Purchase Parkway till that happens and signage changes.