rhhs's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 160514969 | Thanks! That area is next on my to-do list for survey (after the holidays probably) |
|
| 160525703 | It's rarely used. I added them but kept the notes. Thanks! |
|
| 160507656 | I agree that removal of building names and the construction area should be reverted |
|
| 160092528 | Didn't know about that convention... The pavement you added was repaved all the way to the end of the street, except in front of new buildings that already had good pavement. The one ont eh opposite side was repaved a couple of years ago, and even has tactile paving!
|
|
| 160092528 | I hope you don't mind that I deleted the partial sidewalk you added along Yakubitsa. I think we shouldn't mix the 2 ways of mapping sidewalks within one street. Maybe we should have a discussion to develop our own "Regional convention" on how to map sidewalks... osm.wiki/Sidewalks#Regional_conventions |
|
| 160062263 | Yes, please revert |
|
| 159691359 | Done! In OSM, the name=* tag is strictly reserved for an object's name, so it should not be used for descriptions (there's description=* for that). |
|
| 159666706 | Thanks! In that case it's better to tag it with disused:amenity=restaurant and delete all other tags that are no longer relevant (I just did that). |
|
| 159666706 | Temporary closed, or permanently? |
|
| 159691359 | Thanks for your edits, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Is "Muddy meadow" really the name of that piece of land, or a description of it? Maybe it would be better described with amenity=car_park and surface=mud? |
|
| 159601573 | OK. I put it up for discussion here https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/motorway-status-of/122136 and hope that will solve the issue. Please add your opinion. |
|
| 159601573 | We should map the on-the-ground truth. It is a fact that the ways you edited do not have motorway legal status (you can ride a bike or a horse on it if you like), so it is not a motorway. That the kilometer marks start earlier than the motorway is confusing, but not a reason to consider it a motorway, I think. Same for the section at Правешки ханове: it is legally not a motorway (although you can't legally reach it on horseback). You mention that it was discussed (where?) but you are the only one reverting edits by others who think it should be tagged as a trunk or primary road. |
|
| 159605796 | Again, if you don't understand why someone made edits, please contact that mapper and ask why instead of reverting edits. |
|
| 159574299 | Hi, I think you made a mistake here. I think there are a OBB and a Postbank next to each other, and you changed the OBB to a Postbank that is already mapped? |
|
| 159601573 | Not many times, if you care to discuss it before reverting my edits. The sign that a motorway starts is here https://maps.app.goo.gl/GhDR21UugYuTWQPN8 Before that sign, the road does not have motorway status, so I changed it to trunk road. See also this discussion https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/where-does-a-motorway-begin-and-end/117844 |
|
| 158174236 | It's drawn as it was when I was there on the day of the edit, although I think I made a mistake at the entrance /exit barriers. Will check again |
|
| 157659860 | Please, when you add an object like a playground, don't give it a descriptive name like Детска площадка. It's a description of it, but it is not its name. |
|
| 158571665 | Last time I was there, cycling on the north side of Filip Kutev was on the road, on a painted cycle lane (still mapped with cycleway:right=lane on the road) and the sidewalk was for pedestrians only. Has this changed? |
|
| 158400569 | Hi, are you sure these streets have the legal status of "living street"? See highway=living_street If they have, the change must have been very recently. The only street in Sofia that I know with that status is Цар Иван Шишман in the centre (see the sign on the right https://maps.app.goo.gl/nZakpEs8qooY3LtLA ) |
|
| 158185860 | Can you please check your edits on way/157691259 ? afaik it used to be a shooting range, but was changed into a museum in 1969. It is certainly a building, so that you deleted building=yes was an error. |