Hi Tonushka,

I noticed that some features were deleted when they were no longer in use. In OpenStreetMap it’s usually preferred to keep such objects and mark them with the `disused:` (or sometimes `abandoned:`) prefix instead of deleting them outright.

Keeping the objects helps preserve the mapping history and can also be useful if the feature still physically exists but is simply not operating anymore.

So for example, instead of removing a shop that has closed, it is often better to change
`shop=...` → `disused:shop=...`.

Just wanted to mention this in case it’s helpful for future edits. Thanks for contributing to OSM!

Ich habe mir erlaubt, es wieder einzutragen.(changeset/178971940)

Ist schon wieder geöffnet, oder?

Hi,

I think this edit was erroneous. There is connection between the two road segments of Jalan ampang.

Regards
Rene

Hi dpolovinkin,

I think this layer tag is used to describe the relative position of elements to others. In this case "layer=-1" means: "The steps and footpaths are on top (i.e. above) of the building". At least that is my understanding of the layer tag.

Kommentar zu Testwecken für https://github.com/rene78/latest-changes

Noch ein Kommentar zu Testzwecken. Jetzt kommen 2 Leerzeilen:

Das sollte richtig gerendert werden.

Kommentar zu Testwecken für https://github.com/rene78/latest-changes

👍

👍

Hi SithMaster,

the tag 'building:part' was the correct one here. Can you please change it back?

Thanks and regards
Rene

I have reverted it for all stations.