Hi cornx,
thanks for your contributions to OpenStreetMap.
I guess there is a typo in building=monestery and it should be monastery like the amenity?
Can you please check this again?
Thanks,
redd

Hi SK53,
thanks for you very active contributions to OpenStreetMap. It seems like you did an typo on building=semidetached_houseqaa on way/807477682.
Can you have a look again on that one?
Thanks,
redd

Hi UdayGowda,
maybe you are still get informed, when I react on this changeset.
The building tag should be used to describe what kind of building it is. In this example most likely "office", or more general "commercial".
The software company itself could be described as office=software.
Could you please review your changes and try to improve it?
Thanks,
redd

danke!

Hall Molker,
mit deiner Änderung gibt es leider ein paar Probleme, daher würde ich dich bitten diese Relation wieder zu entfernen.
1. Es fehlt die Angabe von Quellen
2. Der name ist falsch verwendet, dies wäre eher eine description. Aber auch dann falsch, denn OpenStreweMap ist kein Geschichtsbuch.
3. Bereits bei einer anderen von dir erstellen Relation wurde diskutiert, dass historisch geplante Baustellen nicht in OpenStreetMap sein sollten, da diese vor Ort kaum erkennbar sind, sondern wohl nur mit historischem Material überprüfbar sind. Dies widerspricht daher dem Grundsatz, dass es vor Ort (on-the-ground) überprüfbar sein soll. (Siehe relation/9433041)

Vielen Dank,
redd

Hi gominu,
danke fuer deine Beitraege zu OpenStreetMap!
Ich glaube der watermill fehlt das doppelte l in deiner Erfassung building=watermil, siehe node/9672133820
Koenntest du das bitte nochmal pruefen?
vielen Dank!
redd

Hi Lukas,
vielen Dank für deine Beiträge zu OpenStreetMap!
Vermutlich hat sich hier bei diesem Changeset ein Tippfehler eingeschlichen building=staricase?
siehe way/520825800
Könntest du das bitte nochmal überprüfen und korrigieren?
Vielen Dank,
redd

hier hat der User auch schon eine komische Relation erstellt: changeset/118276968

Hi Note Control,
thanks for your efforts! Can you in future please include the note url link into the changeset as source= tag?
Thanks,
Redd

Thank you!

Thanks!

Thank you!

THANKS!

Hi surt,
thanks for your long history of contribution to OpenStreetMap!
I hope its okay for you, that I react in english language.
May I have question about this way: way/1081007977
Are you really sure this is a bridge? For me it seemed more like a normal way, but the water had a tunnel underneath?
Thanks!
Redd

(this was my first time when using the multi upload function of Osmand.. and probably my last time)

sorry for large changeset. This was a mistake. Osmand does a bad job when uploading several POIs. I wanted to upload 3 trees in Portugal. Instead it uploaded 2 trees in Portugal and 1 tree in USA.

THANKS!

Hi RemyH,
thanks for you contributions to OpenStreetMap.
I hope that you are ok, that I contact you in english language!

May I ask why you replaced fountain=drinking_fountain with fountain=Drinking Fountain?

In OpenStreetMap we usually write the values without capital letters and without spaces.

Can you please revert your change?

merci!

redd

Hi aselvadeasfalto,
thanks for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
I hope it is okay for you that I contact in english language.
On 1 node there was a huge mistake where you added fountain value with "drinkingamenity=bar_name=flavour_opening_hours=ph,mo-su_12:00-02:00", see node/9374445313

Can you please check again and resolve this?

Obrigad!

redd

it also affects some other drinking water changes from you, see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1kCG