In the meantime the change is reverted by another user, see changeset/161764790 . Please stop making fake edits, otherwise I need to report you to the data working group

Hi and welcome to OSM,

You made a couple of mistakes in your initial changesets. This particular one seems to be the worst. You created a motorway which ends in the middle of nowhere, which obviously does not seem right. Please use useful changeset comments and describe the source of your changes.

thank you
ratrun

Your edits are of very bad quality and your changeset titles "Update" are totally useless. Please provide the source of your edits.

Hi,
I'm also not from this area, but this edit seems wrong. Please explain the barrier of which you are talking in in the changeset comment. I doubt that it is possible to spot a barrier from an Esri World Imagery source.
The edit destroyed the routing and therefore I plan to revert this changeset if you do not provider better source references.

Hi,
you reverted my guessed fix, but now the dead end road starts out of the blue, which does not make any sense.

Please fix this obvious routing error
thanks
ratrun

Hi and welcome to OSM!

Please connect the end nodes of the ways with the junction node. You have created a lot of routing errors as the ways are now unconnected! See OSMI routing view: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-89.33779&lat=42.23967&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=unconnected_open_ends_1

Can you please fix the errors you have created?

Thank you for the information and your effort for cleaning the data.

Hi, please stop continuing with your current editor pattern. You are creating a lot of unconnected ways and therefore destroy routing capability. See the Openstreetmap Inspector routing view: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=20.44550&lat=44.53589&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=unconnected_open_ends_1
Please fix the errors you have created. You need to merge the erroneous nodes to the crossing ways.

thanks

ratrun

Thank you for confirmation!

I now changed the names according to your instructions above, see changeset/160947436#map=16/48.77957/2.09820

Please note that I didn't change the name yet for the segments further in the south here: way/22675305#map=18/48.767370/2.068825
I used the search functionality of JOSM for the name replacement, but intentionally didn't apply the name change for these segments as they seem to be too far awway. Or shall I also change the name here?

Good luck with your JOSM attempt! I recommend watching an introduction video before starting. People say that JOSM is more difficult to use compared to ID, but for me the opposite is the case.

Sorry I can`t help you with instructions for ID as I'm not familiar with the ID web editor. I just use JOSM as it is much better. But I can perform the change for you if you like. Please give me instructions where to change the name. From your description it looks to me as if the name "Route de Dampierre" needs to be replaced on all the segments, such that there does not remain any segment with that name finally. Please confirm.

OK thank you. You changed the name, but why did you remove the highway tag? See way/809915095/history

Hi and welcome to OSM.

Can you please explain your change here. It does not make sense to me and deepl translates your changeset comment into "Following deliberation by the CM in September 2024" which does not make sense either.
Currently the road is interrupted and lacking connectivity, see OSM inspector routing view https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=2.10659&lat=48.78191&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=unconnected_open_ends_1

thanks

ratrun

Thanks, looks good now.

Hi,
this change does not seem to be a good idea. See way/448845172: you left the descriptive tags of the highway but removed the highway tag itself. Now there are unconnected ways.
Please fix this on that location and also here: way/467276748

thanks

ratrun

Please check the complete history in the future before you make statements about a change. I only connected unconnected ways to newly created constructions, which were added by another user @Jonaianimail. See the history here: way/1345491656/history

thanks
ratrun

Hi,
you are adding new ways without considering the existing ways. Besides that you are not commenting your changesets.
Please improve this in your future edits.
As your new ways were mostly superfluous, I fixed all the connectivity errors by removing these new unconnected ways.

Hi,

please check this edit: It is totally unrealistic as the connectivity to the existing road network is broken

thanks

ratrun

Hi,

this edit is big and covers a huge area. Please create smaller change-sets in the future such that it becomes easier to check what it contains.

Something weird has happened in this particular change: Can you please check node node/3674220421

This node is just an example of more bad edits in this specific area. Please try to correct the data back.

thanks,

ratrun

Hi,
your edits contain a lot of connectivity problems. These are detected with https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-0.95282&lat=41.50886&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=unconnected_open_ends_1

Please connect the ways at the junctions.

thank you
ratrun

Hello and welcome to OSM,

I spotted your edits as they are of low quality. These tertiary roads you are creating do not seem right. According to your change-set comment you are using Bing images as source. But I do not spot any ways on the locations where you created these new tertiary highways. Please describe the motivation of these edits and correct the data you entered.

thanks

ratrun