House numbers don't go in name field
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109306089

House numbers don't go in the name field
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109564179

House numbers don't go in the name field
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109565644

If these are footpaths then the correct way to tag separate ways is with footway=highway and footway=sidewalk, see osm.wiki/Sidewalks Alternatively tagging the parent road with the sidewalk tag instead of drawing a sperate way may be easier to maintain. This described under "Sidewalk as refinement to a highway" in the wiki page
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109862264

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Many buildings in NZ consist of 90 degree corners, this can be enforced in Id by right clicking and selecting "Square"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109858613

What are you attempting to achieve here? The changeset comment says walkway but the edit removed the name for a cafe.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109563747

What are you attempting to achieve here? The changeset comment says walkway but the edit removed the name for a cafe.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109563747

Please don't put address information in the name key, there are separate addr:housenumber and addr:street that should be used instead. See addr=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109564517

Correct action is to tag as access=private to mark legal access, not delete the trace. access=private

Please use meaningful changeset comments: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments Do you have a source for this manor? A name?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109235140

Why have you deleted way 411173270? It is visible in the aerial imagery you refer to
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109294632

This changeset has marked a huge portion of O'Farrells Track as a culvert, I suspect what you wanted to achieve would be tagging the portion of the stream that passes under the track with tunnel=culvert and layer=-1
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109328059

Without local knowledge I cannot determine if the building is entirely used for sanitary purposes or if the tag just represents a toilet in a building.

This is not supported by the imagery and appears to be vandalism. Reverting
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108470262

The new builds appear to be visible in the Bing, ESRI and Maxar imagery which is available i the Id editor. Just beware that the imagery mat itself be offset, not sure how to correct for that in Id, easy in JOSM
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108450719

You have tagged the roof as flat but from the LINZ aerial imagery it appears to be hipped whilst the adjacent roof is flat
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107970691

You have tagged a forest polygon with name=Main Road, is this really the name of the forest? What is the source for this?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107989967

Vandalism, reverted
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107980446

Vandalism, reverted
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107980615

You've put a Cafe name on the moving walkway object, instead you should create a new node tagged amenity=cafe and name=Pier Cafe
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107853530