OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
78038727

Why is layer=-1 needed? It is not tagged as a tunnel and appears in aerial imagery as on the surface, it even has a bridge crossing it
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78038727

78030522

Why layer=-2 and not -1 ?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78030522

78030169

This should be layer=-1 if it is a tunnel under the surface, layer=1 is above. Also please dont put descriptions in the name: osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78030169

77757020

I've reverted this changeset. The way it was done (and is again) is correct. It is topographically connected but tagged as access=no etc.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77757020

77757020

Can you please confirm if this section of road is actually reopened?

77958277

This changeset has changed the highway tag from construction but hasn't removed the construction=unclassified tag
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77958277

77757020

Oh hang on, lloks like that section was disconnected due to a road closure. Seems it may still be closed: https://www.journeys.nzta.govt.nz/manawatu-whanganui/traffic-update/741257 Have you confirmed this is actually open again?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77757020

77757020

Review: Looks good now, thanks
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77757020

77757176

Review: Looks correct to me, thanks
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77757176

77702705

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Are you familiar enough with the area to resolve nearby note note/1164314 ?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77702705

77714962

Hi, you've put covered=yes on a lot of the driveways you have added. Are they really covered by a building or structure? covered=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77714962

77651368

Please don't put descriptions like "Morningside Reserve Path" in the name field unless it is in common use/sign posted. See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77651368

77308215

All vandalism reverted

77476487

Changed to playground

77497799

Welcome to OSM and thanks for you edits. One thing to note, please don't use the name field for descriptions like "Public Walkthrough", see osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77497799

77490541

This changeset has introduced a duplicate bus stop. Also the exisiting bus stop does have the number - it is in the ref field which I believe is the correct way to tag this. I will remove your new poi. Please feel free to modify the existing bus stop if you think it still needs changing. Thanks, Rob.

77476487

Typo? Isn't way/749133111 a playground rather than a quarry?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77476487

77473071

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. I see you tried to correct the vandalism of the school name. Rather than creating a new node the brst solution was to edit the exisiting node. I've mreged your fix with the exisiting node so it should all be good now. Thanks, Rob.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77473071

77308215

Please do not rename objects with personal names and add fake parks.

77445267

Please don't put descriptions such as "Self Contained" in the name field (see osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only). Also your new node node/7003130893 is very close to node/6204386885. Are they distinct entities or do the refer to the same place?