ralley's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 71463124 | No problems, thanks for looking into this. Let me know if you need a hand. There is also the talk-nz mailing list (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nz) if you have any questions for local mappers. |
|
| 68775480 | This changeset has placed a building inside a building, Can you please fix. What is the source of this data? I'm not aware of any church that has a presence inside St Lukes Mall (I'm a local) |
|
| 71463124 | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits. Your latest change has some problems around Sunbrae drive. You've tagged a large stretch of the stream as being in a culvert but it can actually be seen to only enter a short culvert under Sunbrae drive. Also you have placed a ford on Sunbrae drive. |
|
| 70905501 | This changeset was reverted by changeset/71025096 |
|
| 70905501 | Looks like an error or vandalism to me, will you revert Pascal? |
|
| 70633452 | I think Hell Pizza was correct: https://hellpizza.com/ |
|
| 70535061 | Hi welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. A couple of questions: which router were you using that needed this way added to avoid routine through backyards? You've added a path but from the aerial imagery it looks like you've mapped the footpaths and a driveway as a single way? The way you have added appears to be unconnected from any other ways and so will not be used by routers anyway. |
|
| 70402283 | Thanks for the quick response, whether or not it shows up differently depends on the program rendering the map, on the website it is different but not very visible. When I convert OSM for Garmin GPS's I render closed tracks with crosses to make this sort of thing more obvious. I've added the fences used to close off closed section. At the Northern end the fence is not at the start of the closed section, there was a temporary barrier there but it keeps being removed. |
|
| 70402283 | Please don't delete this - the path is physically still there (thought partially overgrown) and thus should still be on the map. The correct way is to tag it as access=no (as it was) to mark that it is closed. |
|
| 70399790 | Please use meaningful changeset comments as per osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
|
| 70381612 | What is your source for this? I can't see the two new motorway links you've added on any aerial imagery and you have put roads through buildings. Also please use meaningful changeset comments as per osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
|
| 70337233 | You've changed the Junction Hotel to a hostel named GBD yet according to http://www.thejunction.net.nz/grahamstown-bar-and-diner/ this is still the hotel with a restaurant as well. I think you should revert the change to the hostel and add a restaurant as well (named Grahamstown Bar and Diner with an alt_name of GBD). There is also no need to add a note if you are making a change |
|
| 70300543 | Hi, I think the addresses you added should be tagged as addr:suburb=Birkdale and addr:city=Auckland |
|
| 70296640 | The houses you have added have a lot of angles that are close to but not quite 90 degrees. In ID if you right click the way you can select "Square" (or shortcut S) which will make the angles 90 degrees. |
|
| 70094741 | This changeset has added a church building inside the library building - can you please fix. I have commented on a few of your changesets (http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=8714835), can you please look into these comments. |
|
| 69729393 | If you use JOSM (+ utilsplugin2) you can add node (Shift+D) to add a node from co-ordinates. Then select the newly added node and your existing node and replace geometry (Ctrl+Shift+G) to update your existing node to the new coordinates |
|
| 67181944 | Hi there, this changeset has resulted in two overlapping churches, "Melville Methodist Church / Hamilton Methodist Parish" and "Hamilton Maori Seventh-Day Adventist Church" |
|
| 68269314 | Interesting, looks like AC or HNZ just stuck the macron on afterwards (it's not painted/printed like the rest of the sign) which is what made me think they were defaced. |
|
| 69694333 | Shouldn't this be Q143? |
|
| 69586779 | Source was local knowledge (visited 26-Apr-2019) |