Why did you delete the parking iasle? Also you added a dangling footway also tagged as a crossing which is not required - there was already a crossing node.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82367471

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Instead of amenity=marketplace (amenity=marketplace) Countdown should be tagged as shop=supermarket (shop=supermarket)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82367630

There is already a park here "Windy Ridge Reserve" which is the correct name according to the Auckland Council park extents data set - reverting your change
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82327753

Please don't use the name for descriptions
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82326855

This just appears to be vandalism, i.e. a house tagged as a highway rest area
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82327211

Please don't use the name field for descriptions like "Soccer field"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82327398

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. There are a few problems: 1) IT should not be tagged as a ford; 2) It appears to be a driveway not a footway; 3) If it was a footway it should not be tagged motor_vehicle=yes; 4) An address should not be used as a highway name; 5) I doubt horse=yes is correct
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82327512

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. You have added parking=carports to the whole parking area but that is for covered parking (parking=*). From the aerial imagery it appears as if the majority of the car park is uncovered. I think you should just add an entity tagged building=carport for the specific carport area.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82317480

This changeset also dragged a node from the Massey Uni car park onto Albany Expressway - fixed.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82246726

This changeset has overlayed a highway (tagged crossing) on top of the existing highway (tagged footway) which is an error. Instead I've tagged the nodes where the existing footway crosses the Albany Express way as a crossing and use "crossing=traffic_signals". Please look out for warnings and erros in the ID editor because it warned of this problem
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82291217

These changes are not supported by aerial imagery and based on the names used and description appear to be vandalism and are being reverted. Please note that OSM is meant to reflect real world verifiable details only and should not be used for fantasy mapping
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82275238

These changes are not supported by aerial imagery and based on the names used and description appear to be vandalism and are being reverted. Please note that OSM is meant to reflect real world verifiable details only and should not be used for fantasy mapping
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82275160

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits - this change has created a duplicate for Springvale Drive that has existed in OSM since 2010. I will merge your new tags with the existing way and delete the duplicate.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82245545

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Unfortunately there are multiple problems with your changes: 1) You appear to have added a driveway tagged as a residential road; 2) You tagged a residential building as a courthouse (subsequently removed in another changeset) 3) You deleted the address node for 92 Bentley Avenue. 4) You dragged the node for 40 Malborough Ave to the wrong position
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82233464

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Rather than putting the bus stop number in the name field the typical system in NZ is to put it in the ref field. Typically name is used to hold the descriptive name if there is one.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82207564

Thanks Cretti, I've re-tagged as open as per your reference and https://www.journeys.nzta.govt.nz/traffic/areawarnings/275912

Review: Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. I think for a shared way you should tag this with both bicycle=yes and foot=yes as well as segregated=yes|no as sppropriate. Cheers, Rob.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81936930

Thanks for the edit but please don't repeat the object description/attribute in the name field: osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81568735

As discussed via PM I have undone this change and all the others that wronly changed Saint Lukes to St Lukes. This is as per osm.wiki/Naming_conventions#Don.27t_use_abbreviations

Looks good to me, thanks very much.