OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
63602177

As per https://www.eda.admin.ch/countries/new-zealand/en/home/representations/embassy-wellington/consulate-auckland.html/content/contacts/en/EDAVis/A/271 the Swiss Consulate is in Massey. Do you have a source for this edit?

79139769

Hi welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Rather than drawing footpaths as seperate ways usual practice in NZ is to add sidewalk tags to the existing road. See sidewalk=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79139769

79137782

Why remove the no-exit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79137782

79131639

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. There are some problems with your changes: 1) Change set comment does not describe what you did and why; 2) Redundantly added a residential area within existing; 3) Improper tags on office. Please see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments and office=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79131639

78808859

Environment Canterbury - https://ecan.govt.nz/

79071758

Why is the footway tagged with layer=-1? Is it really underground?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79071758

78732253

Are you sure these are paths for non-motorised vehicles? (highway=path) From the aerial imagery they appear to be driveways (service=driveway)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78732253

78721870

Please don't put descriptions in the the name: osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78721870

78660983

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. A couple of points: please don't put descriptions like "private' in the name, it is reserved for names only. Also this is still tagged as access=yes which contradicts it being private. Simillary operator=DOC is inconsistent with it being private
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78660983

78491001

Not sure how best to tag a Marae, I've usually just seen the building tagged. Maybe ask on the talk nz mailing list? (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nz)

78491001

Review as requested: Rather than "name=not in current use" please tag as dusused or abandoned as appropriate. See disused=*:
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78491001

78493074

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. One thing - I don't think service=drive-through is correct as per service=drive-through Maybe just leave it at highway=service?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78493074

78448190

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit - I've changed the shop type to "deprtment store" as it is a better fit for Kmart.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78448190

78439131

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Is this actually 3989 State Highway 47 or is have you put the suburb and postcode in the addr:housenumber field? Is it really named "Cross X Roads" or is that a description? Is this a free site for self contained vehicles or an actual camp site (i.e. where people pitch tents etc.)?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78439131

78423614

Thanks for fixing that up
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78423614

78423614

Phone numbers should be in E.164 format: phone=*#Usage
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78423614

78300618

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Can you please use more descriptive changeset comments - it helps people understand your edits. See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments for guidance. Thanks.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78300618

77958277

construction= now removed by original editor

78195850

Removed test

78195850

Pleas dont use the name field for non-names - osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78195850