fence lines and tracks instead of unclassified roads?

more rewarding work can be done here:

osm.org/edit?editor=id&node=4056919450#map=17/-17.88504/31.24082

osm.org/edit?editor=id&node=6203601545#map=16/-17.3350/31.3892

osm.org/edit?editor=id&node=307135034#map=15/-17.3513/31.0648

osm.org/edit?editor=id#map=16/-17.3615/30.9530

my workflow:

Josm with MapWithAI Plugin. Pick only the well detected shapes.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=142535442

Then do the rest manually with the JOSM building tool

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=142537256

It will still be a tedious job.

https://josm.openstreetmap.de/

Hi,
you should have used esri instead of bing imageary because its much more recent in this area.
I would suggest to look at all available imagery sources before start editing
Should we revert this changeset?

these are no residential roads!

sorry, wrong changeset

these are no residential roads!

Hi,
here is the problem:
barrier=gate without access tags

node/3278058768#map=19/-29.58449/29.28559

access=*

hi,
imo a parked truck.
Please compare the available imagery sources.
Here is a screenshot showing how to switch background imagery in ID:
https://up.picr.de/45564464yn.jpg

itsnotahutitsatree

a tree

Hi,
rapid data may be based outdated imagery.
Please switch to maxar background layer and add only structures that are clearly visible on that layer.
https://up.picr.de/45564464yn.jpg

It is not necessary to add a source tag because the source is stored in the changeset meta data. Please replace the Rapid road tags with more appropriate tags

Hallo,
du nutzt veraltete Hintergrundbilder.
Bitte auf Maxar umschalten
https://up.picr.de/45564464yn.jpg

extrem kurze Wege bitte nicht einzeichnen.
Meiner Meinung nach nur ein Zugang zu einem Privatgrundstück 37,5m:
way/1181784777

Sehr schmal und scheinbar nur wenig genutzt. highway=path?:
way/688526923
way/1181789232

highway=service
way/300918734

Update erforderlich:
way/151845945
way/300918757

Apple oder tomtom Daten. Einfach löschen wenn offensichtlich falsch:
way/1013644029

Bist du vor Ort?

surface=asphalt or surface=paved.

no marked lanes, not a bridge ..

https://up.picr.de/45564464yn.jpg

id screenshot to follow for more up to date imagery

Hallo,
habe den Node mit den Version 1 tags zurück geholt

Hi,
could you please explain why you added the oneway tag once again.

I have reverted this changeset due to routing issues.

15th Avenue is already there!
reverted

please check for the most recent imagery layer before start mapping.
https://up.picr.de/45564464yn.jpg
As you can see some ways are not there anymore.
There are new buildings instead.

for short private roads like this:
way/1166157205
way/1166157206

best practice: do not map them
second best practice: do not map them
third best practice: "highway=service" + "service=driveway"

way/193222068
way/193222055

oneway=yes ???

oneway=*?uselang=en

please fix as soon as possible

It looks like Tomtom is optimizing its AI based on outdated imagery - at our expense. Please note that Maxar is almost always more up-to-date than Bing. Please also ask yourself if it is always necessary to add all these roads to openstreetmap just because some maproulette challenge asks for it. Most of these roads are more or less worthless for routing. They may change or disappear soon, but nobody will notice.