way/407837170
way/450622201
way/450622127
way/259885701
way/620815144

Hello Raenbow,
we need some patience. Most new residential areas have a similar looking road network. With a little experience and the existing building footprints, you can predict
the course of the road.
These curvy streets will almost certainly change or disappear one day. Here are some examples of streets that were tagged as residential roads too soon:
way/653865189
way/106353261
way/862882723
way/655522964
The problem is finding such fake streets in dense urban areas. I would like to know if the Adt will systematically revise and update their edits.

simplify your roads, guess the future layout, instead of mapping yesterdays sat images,

way/1035155610
should not be mapped

way/1035155610

is not a residential road,

https://livingatlas.arcgis.com/wayback/#ext=29.46349,0.41478,29.48033,0.42560&active=26083&localChangesOnly=true

The residents left because of unsafe conditions, I would guess.

It is not a good idea to map here with oblique images from only one source

Hello,
could you please check your changes on this road with maxar premium beta?
way/28675440

ich habe es mal auf covered=yes geändert.
covered=*
Gruß Ralf

Hello simoa,
please have a look here:
way/1023706889
maxar premium beta is more recent than the project imagery!
These two buildings do not have shared nodes. There is even a road between them.
way/1020255842
way/1020255842
Refere to maxar.
Please notice also the incorrect layer tag.
Hot's Mogadishu projects mainly produce garbage because participants rely on only one imagery source.

please see my comment here:
changeset/116589105

Hi simoa, this bug was introduced by project 11382 and therefor it should be fixed by project 11382. Also the original mapper should be notified by a validator. Imo this is a kind of bug that should not stay in the database longer than necessary. It is hard to miss and also easy to fix.

Danke, ist erledigt
Gruß
Ralf

Ich bin mir ehrlich gesagt gar nicht so sicher ob das Semikolon hier angebracht ist. Bei der Auswertung von mueschel spielt es anscheinend keine Rolle. Geändert habe ich jetzt noch die Farben an der Reuterbergkreuzung und an der Alsbachkreuzung die Autobahnwegweisung.

Hello, why have you not removed these obviously wrong trunk roads? The same @changeset as for the crooked buildings

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.6765124&lng=8.310799&z=17&pKey=275084224476902&focus=photo&x=0.4938977857321294&y=0.4624030612862761&zoom=0

Mapillary ist hier eine gut Quelle.
Reuterberg;Rittal wäre jeweils weiss.

http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/destinationsign/example/index.htm#way=206857199&namedroutes=1&fromarrow=0&include_sgn=1&include_way=1&country=

way/206857199/history

Hallo Andreas,
mit diesen tags werden Wegweiser nachgebildet. Wenn du hier etwas änderst, dann wäre es gut die Auswirkungen zu überprüfen. Bei dem obigen Beispiel hast du die Spurtrennung entfernt. Dadurch zeigt jetzt das Autobahnsymbol auch in Richtung Alsbach.
Gruß
Ralf

http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/destinationsign/example/index.htm#zoom=13&lat=50.7362&lon=8.2176

http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/destinationsign/example/index.htm#zoom=13&lat=50.7362&lon=8.2176

osm.wiki/User:Mueschel/DestinationTagging

way/1029868959

Hallo, die Abbiegespur ist schon als turn:lane vorhanden. Bitte wieder entfernen.

osm.wiki/DE:Fahrspuren

No buildings in this boring tile?
No problem, switch it to the "all mapped" state and jump to the next one. But please do not add unconnected, superfluous, temporary roads
(buildings only project)