100% agree. Just wanted to make sure there weren't data quality issues you were aware of.

Happy mapping!

Thanks. I added back some info you removed instead of reformatting. Was there a reason you removed e.g. phone=*?

Thanks. We can tag diet:vegan=*, so I've set this to diet:vegan=yes. But if this bakery offers exclusively (or nearly exclusively) vegan products, and no non-vegan foods, we could tag it more precisely as diet:vegan=only. Are you familiar with the options offered at this store?

Happy mapping!

Thanks. I left a message on changeset/162981658 asking about those.

Hey, a couple of noexit=yes nodes were removed from your changes in changeset/178925235. Could you confirm that those weren't correct? What did you intend by noexit=yes in the middle of a way? Did you intend to add a barrier=gate access=no or something similar?

Thanks

Wouldn't the second-from left lane in turn:lanes:forward=* be slight_left and not slight_right?

Looks good, thank you! One minor note is that, since many buildings are rectangular or composed of rectangular elements, it's often considered standard practice to rectangularize a building after tracing or adjusting it. In iD, the web-based editor you used, you can do this by right-clicking the selected object and selecting "Square," or by selecting the area and pressing Q.

But that's a totally minor thing. Thank you for keeping OpenStreetMap data up-to-date, we always love to have more contributors :) If you have any questions please feel free to reach out here, or I've found the OSM US Slack to be a very helpful resource as well: https://slack.openstreetmap.us/

Thanks again for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Hey, congrats on your changeset #10,000! 🥳

Okay. I think there are additional tags that could be added to better represent this, but I'm not familiar enough to be sure. I think this should be good enough for now. Thanks for your help!

But this is still designated 223rd Ave, and is not considered a driveway?

Is there a sign at the entrance to the private section that says "private road" or "keep out"?

Thanks

Thanks for the edit @sd97. In addition to the note above from @Glassman, I'd like to point out that Google Maps' licensing prohibits use in OpenStreetMap: please make sure you don't add any data derived from Google Maps or other proprietary sources. Thanks!

Thanks for these 5/405 interchange edits. I *think* they're good but I haven't looked into the tagging super closely, nor am I very familiar with the interchange lanes. But broadly these changes look good, so... thanks!

If you want a more detailed / expert review, you could probably ask for help on https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ -- I've found that it's a great resource for consulting with other contributors.

Thanks for the contributions, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Could you confirm whether this is a continuation of the public 223rd Ave, or whether this is a private driveway? Thanks!

Thanks. Just out of curiosity, could you link me to the Sound Transit document you referenced, or otherwise explain how to access it?

Thanks! Building data is definitely sparse in this area, so thanks for helping out!

Thanks for the contribution! I expanded the direction from NW to Northwest (that's the convention in OpenStreetMap), but otherwise your changes look good.

Thanks again, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out here, via user messages, or on Slack at https://slack.openstreetmap.us/

No problem, thanks for your work.

Happy mapping!

Hey, I noticed you added a tag "ref:"="id3king=248". Did you mean "ref:id3king"="248"? Seems like the tag name was split accidentally.

There are a few more of these that I found on https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/ref: so if you know what these tags are, do you mind fixing those? Also it would be nice to have a documentation page on the wiki. I've never heard of id3king, is it some data source?

Thanks for the edits. Here's a non-exhaustive review of some things I see.

* Looks like you have bus:lanes:backward=designated|yes in some places where I think it's bus:lanes:backward=yes|designated. *:lanes:backward=* tags are tabulated from the perspective of traveling in the backwards direction on that road. So if a road has 2 lanes per direction and the curb lanes are both bus lanes, it would be bus:lanes:*=yes|designated for both.

* I think this should have access:lanes=* as well. That's the "only" in "Bus Only". So in addition to bus:lanes:backward=yes|designated I think there should be access:lanes:backward=yes|no to indicate that general traffic isn't allowed in that lane. Or maybe it's implied, but I'm not sure.

* is bicycle=designated really the case for both directions in places where e.g. cycleway:left=no?

* Sometimes when approaching an intersection, the bus lane changes to a right turn lane. Not sure if there's any of these south of MLK, but I've represented those as turn:lanes:forward=|right with turn:bus:lanes:forward=| and turn:bicycle:lanes:forward=| based on the signs which read something like "Right turn only, except buses and bicycles".

Yeah, I enjoy lane tagging, but it can be super tedious sometimes. Thanks for working on this!

iD is kind of a pain for doing lane tagging, in my experience. Maybe this is an opportunity to try out JOSM ;)

https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Styles/Lane_and_Road_Attributes has some quirks but it's the best visualizer I've found.

Well, thanks! Let me know if you have any questions. I think iD suggests it in the sidebar after submitting a changeset, but if you're not on the OSM US Slack (hard to say from a basic search), I've found that to be a super helpful place to ask questions and discuss (especially #tagging channel): https://slack.openstreetmap.us/

Happy mapping!

Hey, thanks for the contribution!

I notice that you added this as a Flock gunshot detector. However, in your note note/5151135, you said that this was a camera. Which is it?

Thanks again, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!