pwbriggs's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 174744770 | Thanks for cleaning that up! Remember that this is a live map ❤️ Please let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! |
|
| 174669376 | Hey, I saw that you deleted this bus lane violator camera. Can you point me to some documentation or confirm that this camera was removed (e.g. was it removed for some reason as part of the SODA/SOAP camera initiatives)? Note that this was not a Flock camera; it was a city-operated bus lane enforcement camera, probably mounted on a streetlight pole. Thanks, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! |
|
| 174439390 | Okay, thanks for confirming. |
|
| 174488227 | Thanks QuiLe and Omnific. I've updated the access tags instead. Thank you for helping make the map more accurate, Jackson, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! |
|
| 174565298 | Hey, thanks for adding your business. I see that there's a business already mapped at this address in unit 505. That business is Skyline Real Estate. Did Umano replace Skyline, or does it share the space and unit number? Thanks! |
|
| 174396163 | Thanks for these edits, they look good as far as I'm familiar with camera tagging. Out of curiosity, what does a SOAP camera stand for? I've never heard that acronym. All of us in the OpenStreetMap community are very grateful for the time and effort you've put into improving the map for its dozens and hundreds of practical uses. Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Always feel free to ask for advice or clarifications, we're here to help support one another. |
|
| 174439390 | Thanks for the OpenStreetMap edit. We appreciate you adding this data. However, are you sure that this is an automatic license place reader? It seems like it's just a normal city traffic monitoring camera. And, if it is, are you sure that this camera is manufactured by Flock Safety as you've indicated? I appreciate that Flock is the most well-known brand of ALPRs, but unless you're sure, it's better to not specify the manufacturer at all than to indicate an incorrect one. Thanks again for your edit, though. What makes OpenStreetMap's data so rich is local community members like you who add information like this. Please reply on this changeset comment or send me a message at osm.org/messages/new/pwbriggs I look forward to helping get these edits ironed out so the cameras can be accurately available for map users. |
|
| 174348350 | Thanks! This type of information is very helpful to have accurate on the map. Your edit looks good; feel free let me know if you have any questions! Thanks again and welcome to OpenStreetMap! |
|
| 174357428 | Looks good to me, thank you for the edit! Adding these kinds of small details are what make OpenStreetMap data so good. I also added the parking lot and drive-through lanes, because that's fun :) Feel free to ask any questions here. I plan to look over your other changes later. Thanks again, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! |
|
| 174357522 | Welcome to OpenStreetMap! We do not allow SEO content to be added to the database. If your business has a publicly-available, walk-in location, we can help you add it to the map. Otherwise, OpenStreetMap does not intend to map online-only services. I've removed both of your edits. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! |
|
| 173734701 | Thank you! Business details are very helpful for OpenStreetMap. The one change I made was to standardize the telephone number format to `+1-206-588-0379`. It's unusual to see that format around here, but it does help international users of OpenStreetMap data to properly parse the number. This is a minor detail though, and the other changes look OK. Thanks again for contributing. Please feel free to ask any questions here. Welcome to OpenStreetMap! |
|
| 174078160 | Looks okay to me, thanks for adding this! Local contributors with on-the-ground knowledge are what lets OpenStreetMap data be so useful for so many different applications. If you're interested in learning more about contributing to OpenStreetMap, please see osm.wiki/Beginners%27_guide or feel free to ask any questions here. Thanks again and welcome to OpenStreetMap! |
|
| 172984985 | Thanks. Lane tagging is helpful. My main feedback is that it's important to be aware about how long the segment of road you're editing is. Unless the entire segment of roadway has a turn lane, you'll need to split the road line into separate segments where the turn lane starts or ends. In the iD editor, this can be done by creating/finding the point on the roadway line where the lane configuration changes (double-click the line if the point doesn't already exist). Then select that point where you want to split the road segment, and hit the "X" key (or right click > "split way"). Then you can edit the tags separately for the different segments of road. But thanks anyway, these edits are useful! Let me know if you have any questions. |
|
| 172984196 | Awesome, thanks for the edit! Based on aerial imagery, it looks like that 3rd lane is a center turn lane, like it is south of the segment you edited. I added some more tags to indicate a center lane, but let me know if that's not the case anymore. Thanks again, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! |
|
| 173111646 | Note: more than 7 mapwithai-derived features in this changeset. The JOSM plugin had trouble with tags when uploading to an existing changeset. |
|
| 173026793 | Thanks for the contribution. Is "Consign Design" furniture shop still here, or was it replaced? |
|
| 172908523 | Okay, I moved leisure=playground to the line and deleted the relation. In my experience iD often isn't great about adding unnecessary relations automatically. I think this sometimes happens when you hit "combine features" with an area selected. Not sure. Happy mapping! |
|
| 172515037 | Awesome, thank you for confirming. I updated the business. Happy mapping! |
|
| 172515037 | Thanks. The menu you linked suggests that this place might be called "OMG! Burger" Could you review this? Thanks, welcome to OpenStreetMap! |
|
| 172908523 | Hey, I noticed that you mapped the playground as a single-member multipolygon relation, and the outer line as a sand surface. Was that intentional, and if so why? Can't you apply the playground tags directly to the way, along with surface=sand? Or am I missing something? Thanks! |