OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
179717843

Just a note about driveways: if they're marked private, that can sometimes cause issues for delivery drivers. Generally, routers consider driveway as basically private, but they're still a way that you'd want to route to if you're going to someone's house.
`access=destination` solves these issues. It's extremely helpful especially on driveway that connect at two points to the main roadway, because routers will try to use those to make a u-turn to reroute.

179262849

If you know what's off limits, would you be able to add access=private or access=no tags to those ways?

179355150

Is this not private?

179144074

Heck, that's a lot of nodes. At that size, I think you would be fine with about 12?

173286411

Alright, sorry for not commenting back till now. I agree that a lot of the sections aren't "park"; I added them in reference to MontCo parks boundaries, but that doesn't seem to transfer 1:1 to OSM in this case. I have been through here in person, but it's been a little while, and I didn't explore the park area too closely.
What should the other sections be tagged as? And if you're more familiar with the area, feel free to change it.

179095164

I added a tag for name pronunciation to the Schuylkill River relation. The changeset covers the whole river.

178701425

If it's already closed, you can leave the node here and change "amenity=restaurant" to "was:amenity=restaurant". I would then delete the name, phone, website, and hours if it's no longer that business (you could do "was:name"). Anyone who wants more info can look at the history of the node.

177652845

Looks great!

177455730

My bad, I thought that building on satellite was the new one...

163173981

Hi there,

Sorry for the edits contrary to local convention. Are you comfortable retagging these, or should I take a look and try to fix it?

I'm not currently editing in Cleveland, but I have family from the area, so if I'm ever mapping back in the area, I'll keep this in mind.

Peter

171099808

I adjusted the boundary to match the official park boundary per MontCo's parcels. I looked at the parcel map and it seems that the weirdness along the west side is due to the Pennypack Trail still being in a parcel of a railroad right-of-way, so the park fills some of that in, but isn't officially in that area.

169636799

Thanks for catching that! It's a Linux command to show a list of peripherals to a computer. I'm not sure how it got transferred into here...

166413778

I'm sorry, I must have mistaken this for a different one I took recently. I have taken this trail before, but I think it may have been last summer...

Apologies for my impulsive revert and comment.

166413778

This isn't closed, I walked the length of it 22 days ago, and it's certainly not blocked. That's why I added it.

165617154

I'm not familiar with the source you used, but I'm not sure it's copyright-legal to copy information from it. Same with Parkopedia on another of your changesets.

163964664

That's an error artifact from me keeping track of progress. I will fix that.

163708165

Hello, I removed bicycle=designated because the paths are tagged with highway=cycleway, which as the wiki says, "implies bicycle=designated" (highway=cycleway), so it's basically redundant. I'm not sure why iD thinks that's an error.

The way they're tagged now means it's a shared use path, but it could also be tagged with highway=path, foot=designated, bicycle=designated and mean the same thing.

I'm not local to the area, but the county database of bicycle infrastructure labels these as Shared Use Paths, so unless labeled differently on-site, they seem to be for both foot and bike.

161402791

I know I saw some discussion about removing place tags from boundaries, but I can't find it. Do you have a reference so I can familiarize myself? I got confused when my Overpass queries stopped displaying as expected...

160086614

Hi, thanks for the edits, but I noticed you removed the 'height' tag when adding 'building:levels'. I recommend leaving 'height' alone, because both tags can coexist. I have readded the 'height' values for this changeset.

158465165

I checked the Friends of Wissahickon rules, and they do specifically state that one should stick to designated trails. Therefore, I just went through and tagged all informal trails with `access=no` to really drive the point home. Other maps/sites should respect that more than the `informal=yes` tag.