👍

Please see changeset/177618912

Hi Phil,

thanks a lot for the detailed explanation.

I’m by no means a legal expert, but I was wondering whether the OGL is actually compatible with OSM’s ODbL license?

In addition, I’d be interested in your view on how useful it is to store external reference IDs directly in OSM. In Germany this has only worked to a limited extent in one case, and in other cases I remember more critical voices than supporters when similar references were discussed.

Best regards,
Pascal

Hi Phil,

just a quick question: I noticed UPRN references added here and was wondering about the data source and whether licensing was considered.

Please let me know if I’m missing something.

Many thanks!

Pascal

👍 TrickyFoxy

Yep

In this case, it seems the reported issues are false positives. The geometries were not changed in a way that would introduce crossings, and the tagging adjustments did not create any new conflicts.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks again for your map edits.

Regards,
Pascal

Hi, just a test?

Hi, just a test?

Hi, just a test?

Hi, just a test?

Reverted by changeset/177636310

Thanks, @eggie

Thank you for the update 👍

The description is already much more neutral. However, the detailed list of services (SEO, SEA, Social Ads, etc.) is still quite close to promotional / SEO-style content and does not really add useful information for the map and its users.

A simpler wording such as “Digital marketing agency” or “Digital marketing consultancy” would be more appropriate for OSM.

Best regards,
Pascal

Reverted by changeset/177636928

Should be checked by the local community. Thanks!

Best regards,
Pascal

Should be checked by the local community. Thanks!

Best regards,
Pascal

Hi shiverinthedark,

I am not sure the added tagging fully makes sense. Did you perhaps try to add this store: https://harder-supps.com/
?

Danke und viele Grüße
Pascal

Hi Gian,

Thank you for your reply and for explaining your edits. I have invited the initial contributor who mapped the waterways here:
changeset/164246111

Best regards,
Pascal

@SekeRob

Could you please take a look at the following changeset:
changeset/177512178

It appears to revert several mapped waterway streams from this changeset.

Thank you very much for checking.

Ciao,
Pascal